Asat Chambered ?

The place to discuss, post photos, video, and audio of the G&L products (US instruments, stomp boxes, etc.) produced after 1991, including the amps & gear we use with them.
kimanistar
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:00 pm

Asat Chambered ?

Post by kimanistar »

Is the Asat Chambered?
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by louis cyfer »

the sh is.
kimanistar
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:00 pm

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by kimanistar »

louis cyfer wrote:the sh is.
sorry...the classic?
User avatar
blargfromouterspace
Posts: 2390
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:45 am
Location: Central Highlands, Australia

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by blargfromouterspace »

All the ASATs can be chambered if they are semi-hollow - like a Thinline tele - otherwise they're totally solid.
-Jamie
crfowler
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:07 pm

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by crfowler »

blargfromouterspace wrote:All the ASATs can be chambered if they are semi-hollow - like a Thinline tele - otherwise they're totally solid.
+1

I bought an ASAT special semi-hollow last year, and it's a great, great instrument. Highly recommended!
User avatar
yowhatsshakin
Posts: 3340
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:00 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by yowhatsshakin »

And I believe that when SH, the f-hole is optional. But you'll need to explicitly specify that otherwise it comes by default.

- Jos
User avatar
LiquidSmoke
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:38 am
Location: Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by LiquidSmoke »

yowhatsshakin wrote:And I believe that when SH, the f-hole is optional. But you'll need to explicitly specify that otherwise it comes by default.

- Jos
I know I shouldn't discuss the actual cost of things, but can I mention that omitting the f-hole from a semi-hollow is a $0 option? It's well worth considering if you are looking for a lighter guitar and don't like the look of f-holes on an ASAT (I don't :oops: )
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by louis cyfer »

LiquidSmoke wrote:
yowhatsshakin wrote:And I believe that when SH, the f-hole is optional. But you'll need to explicitly specify that otherwise it comes by default.

- Jos
I know I shouldn't discuss the actual cost of things, but can I mention that omitting the f-hole from a semi-hollow is a $0 option? It's well worth considering if you are looking for a lighter guitar and don't like the look of f-holes on an ASAT (I don't :oops: )

just hope this doesn't happen without the f-hole. Image
User avatar
LiquidSmoke
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:38 am
Location: Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by LiquidSmoke »

D'oh! How about a small, discrete hole in the back of semi-hollow guitars lacking f-holes, just for pressure equalization?
User avatar
Craig
Site Admin
Posts: 11349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:52 am
Location: Either Coto De Caza, CA or Paso Robles, CA

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by Craig »

LiquidSmoke wrote:D'oh! How about a small, discrete hole in the back of semi-hollow guitars lacking f-holes, just for pressure equalization?
It was never determined what caused his body's top to separate like that and AFAIK it has never happened again. I have several Semi-Hollow bodies without
the f-hole and would not hesitate ordering another.

:ugeek:
--Craig [co-webmaster of guitarsbyleo.com, since Oct. 16, 2000]
Welcome! Read This First
Got a G&L question? Check out the: G&L Knowledgebase
Current G&L Specifications and Options
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Asat Chambered ?

Post by louis cyfer »

Craig wrote:
LiquidSmoke wrote:D'oh! How about a small, discrete hole in the back of semi-hollow guitars lacking f-holes, just for pressure equalization?
It was never determined what caused his body's top to separate like that and AFAIK it has never happened again. I have several Semi-Hollow bodies without
the f-hole and would not hesitate ordering another.

:ugeek:
the only thing that could have caused it was pressure. john at the time would not listen, he kept telling me that it was old damage because by the time he got it, there was a lot of dirt around the edges. but i told him, it happened 2 days before he got it, but i played it at a blues festival after it blew up, the day before he got it, and i was wearing quite a bit of sunblock that day, the dirt and oil happened then. i sent john the photos that were taken the day of the damage, which was friday (he got the guitar monday), and he kept saying, "i don't know, that's a lot of dirt build up". he was a little slow and dense, i simply could not get it through to him.