2Tek

The place to discuss, post photos, video, and audio of the G&L products (US instruments, stomp boxes, etc.) produced after 1991, including the amps & gear we use with them.
lshines
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:48 pm

2Tek

Post by lshines »

Has anyone used a 2Tek bridge in their G&L?
I wonder if G&L would consider offering the 2Tek from the factory?
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: 2Tek

Post by louis cyfer »

since it goes against leo's ideas, meaning to lock the saddles together for better results, and it is heavy and really bulky looking, i am not expecting g&l to offer these. also, since there is still a plate on the bottom that connects it all, am not sure if the benefits claimed are realized any more than a traditional strat bridge with the saddles not touching. i am also not convinced that their theory is correct as far as sound production of a guitar goes.
User avatar
blargfromouterspace
Posts: 2390
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:45 am
Location: Central Highlands, Australia

Re: 2Tek

Post by blargfromouterspace »

I have to agree with Louis on this one. As soon as I read something like "improved individual note articulation" my BS alarm goes off. YMMV.
-Jamie
lshines
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: 2Tek

Post by lshines »

An acquaintance had a PRS McCarty (P90's). Wonderful guitar - sustain and tone that I admired. He got this bug (based on reading in a forum) to have the 2Tek installed. "Who, wait a minute! The PRS bridge was designed to increase sustain, get the vibes to the wood - you're crazy to change it" (we said). Just put new strings on her. He did it anyway.

Now, this is ONLY ONE I've heard - and it isn't any more than an example of ONE (not a good sampling, I know), but H.F.S. this guit SUSTAINS!!! I have to attribute it to the 2Tek (well made piece of equipment imo) - as everything else was the same - same guitar, amp, cable, room, etc. (ok, but new strings). So, I think it made a difference. I also think that G&L's ASAT bridge makes a difference, as opposed to a production fender bridge, - but I don't have good scientific evidence for that one either. (Some of it - with the 2Tek AND my admiration for G&L's - is wow factor. ) I'm just saying....
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: 2Tek

Post by louis cyfer »

that explains it, not hard to improve a prs, they only look good.
Michael-GnL-Michael
Posts: 744
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 8:24 pm

Re: 2Tek

Post by Michael-GnL-Michael »

louis cyfer wrote:that explains it, not hard to improve a prs, they only look good.
If Johnny Hiland is playing the PRS it sounds good.

[youtube]nZqhCYO2s6s[/youtube]

[youtube]LxLeC8BfHQg[/youtube]
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: 2Tek

Post by louis cyfer »

hilland makes anything sound good, but he now plays music man.
Michael-GnL-Michael
Posts: 744
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 8:24 pm

Re: 2Tek

Post by Michael-GnL-Michael »

louis cyfer wrote:hilland makes anything sound good, but he now plays music man.
Makes me so sad that he cannot play the PRS anymore. It's beefy tone worked for HIland IMO. I think Hiland found a guitar he does not sound good on. His Musicman sounds like a toy compared to his PRS. It just does not sound like a grownup guitar. I have yet find anything with him on the Musicman that I can listen all the way through to the end. It is just awful.

[youtube]JRHXtKCZ9BA[/youtube]

These sound effects are better than the tone he is getting currently.

[youtube]ZJTbs7pu-JI[/youtube]


Sorry I have hijacked this thread. No more JH.

.
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: 2Tek

Post by louis cyfer »

i have heard jonny with his new d allen pups and sounded great. but when he plugs into that bolt amp he has been endorsing, his tone suffers greatly.