
Don't worry Louis I already have a replacement pickguard...and it's not tortoise

-Dave
Nice color scheme.Dave_P wrote:Just picked this guy up off of CL, 1997-98 ASAT Classic transparent red, natural wood binding and a maple neck with just the right amount of birdseye...
Very nice looking ASAT !Dave_P wrote:Just picked this guy up off of CL, 1997-98 ASAT Classic transparent red, natural wood binding and a maple neck with just the right amount of birdseye(although I can never seem to photograph it). Not a scratch on it
Don't worry Louis I already have a replacement pickguard...and it's not tortoise![]()
-Dave
Does the crinkle collect dust and dirt in the crevices? Black will look badass.Dave_P wrote:new pickguard is sanded to bare metal and ready for spraying tomorrow
birdseye looks nice, but remember it is weaker. does not mean it is not strong enough, but it is something to keep in mind.Michael-GnL-Michael wrote:Does the crinkle collect dust and dirt in the crevices? Black will look badass.Dave_P wrote:new pickguard is sanded to bare metal and ready for spraying tomorrow
The more birdseye that I see the more I wish I had bought another Legacy that had a birdseye neck when I was shopping. At the time I felt it was too extravagant and indulging of me. I had mixed feelings about investing in music gear again. But I actually went back later to buy it after thinking about things but it had sold. By this time it would have meant keeping both as there was no option of trading one back in months later. I might not have been able to do it at all even a day or two after but I would have been trading up to a more expensive guitar so who knows?
I had not played in years and to get back in required spending a lot of money (to me) on a hobby. I really wanted a 30th Anniversary Legacy as soon as I saw them but pearl white was out of the question. In my frame of mind at that time I would have been embarrassed to break it out with anyone around. I am no longer thinking the same way about things. I am very happy that I made the investment.Dave_P wrote:Michael - Dirt/dust collecting on the old G&L crinkle guards didn't seem to be a problem for me. The texture was light enough were it still felt mostly smooth.
For this guard I used VHT (brand) wrinkle paint, as recommended by Wayne at tone-guard in an older thread I came across. So far it looks ok, maybe a little too wrinkley/busy right now, the last step is to bake it later today to cure the paint which will also change the wrinkle slightly. I'll get pics up when it's done
I've been a fan of birdseye for a while now, the second guitar I ever purchased(Fender Am Std strat) just happened to have some in the neck. I'm not really a fan of the heavily birdseyed ones though, just a few speckles here and there is what catches my eye. I can see feeling like it's a little too flashy, I feel that way about rich woods sometimes. On one hand it's beautiful what nature can produce, on the other it can be just plain gaudy.
Not to suggest I am exposed to enough information or this is remotely scientific, I have not come across anyone who has described their birdseye developing problems that could not be corrected with the same tools as a hard rock maple. I understand it is a flaw in nature but it looks very nice (even when heavily ornate at least when not finished in GOT) and for some reason they feel better to me when I play them. This is not psychological either. It has been something more related to the shape than anything. Perhaps coincidence I doubt it. I think there may be something in common that I cannot pin down. Or there is something in common with non-birdseye that does not feel the same to me. But to me a birdseye has a strong likelihood of being a win-win feature.Dave_P wrote:Louis - So far so good with the birdseye for me. This is my third over the course of around 15 years or so, hoping I didn't just jinx myself