Gibson - why?
-
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:45 am
- Location: Central Highlands, Australia
Gibson - why?
Funny that one of the largest, best known guitar companies that no doubt employs some very talented people could release this eyesore. What were they thinking?!?!
-Jamie
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:23 pm
- Location: Yorkshire, England
Re: Gibson - why?
It would look charmingly rustic without the pick-guard; sorta like a school woodwork project.
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 8:07 pm
- Location: Renton, WA
Re: Gibson - why?
Does the case come with a built in amplifier?
I have 3 guesses why.
1. Because Les Paul has passed and they can now exploit his name.
2. Because the Firebrand series of the past was so succesful they want to replicate it.
3. Because precious attempts to break into the Fender market have failed but this time, well this time it will be different. Introducing the Fender killer!
I have 3 guesses why.
1. Because Les Paul has passed and they can now exploit his name.
2. Because the Firebrand series of the past was so succesful they want to replicate it.
3. Because precious attempts to break into the Fender market have failed but this time, well this time it will be different. Introducing the Fender killer!
Tom
Renton, WA USA
Renton, WA USA
-
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Ontario,Canada
Re: Gibson - why?
Why, because Gibson wants ALL THE UGLY.
IT wouldn't be half bad without the pickguard. I like that the bridge isn't ToM.
IT wouldn't be half bad without the pickguard. I like that the bridge isn't ToM.
-
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:44 am
- Location: England
Re: Gibson - why?
"Good" use for all those unwanted L6-S maple necks...
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:00 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Gibson - why?
Why are they using trumpet mouthpieces as strap buttons? (Edit: Oh I see, is has a B-Bender) And why 3 controls? Yuck ...
- Jos
- Jos
-
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Ontario,Canada
Re: Gibson - why?
Is it a bender? Those are just Dunlop straplocks there Jos.
Ahh yes, I see it now.
Ahh yes, I see it now.
-
- Posts: 3218
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:13 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St Paul
Re: Gibson - why?
Remember what today is! -- Darwin
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:00 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Gibson - why?
No joke here Darwin. See e.g. this Sam Ash website entry.darwinohm wrote:Remember what today is! -- Darwin
- Jos
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 3:36 am
- Location: belgium
Re: Gibson - why?
of course it's clearly not the best thing they made... but come on guys ! it's not that ugly !...
damn i really have to try a B-bender one of these days !
damn i really have to try a B-bender one of these days !
-
- Posts: 3218
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:13 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St Paul
Re: Gibson - why?
WoW, it is no joke!! Actually it is one of the best they have come up with in a long time. Hopefully it will do better then the original issue blue/silver burst Robot that collectors jumped all over!-- Darwin
-
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:44 am
- Location: England
Re: Gibson - why?
On reflection, I could possibly fancy an L6-S, with Mississippi Queen P90-alikes instead of buckers, and a Hipshot on the back.
Gibson could do worse than produce something like that.
But not this runt of a thing, I really don't get it at all.
Gibson could do worse than produce something like that.
But not this runt of a thing, I really don't get it at all.
-
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:11 pm
- Location: Dayton , Ohio
Re: Gibson - why?
the shape is like a PRS Starla with out the Bigsby ...
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:29 pm
- Location: Northeast Ohio
Re: Gibson - why?
But it's, it's, a "hand selected slab of ash!" I mean, Gibson hand selecting a slab of ash with all the other stuff for a mere $1,400? If only I'd seen that before I bought the ASAT Junior II...
I had to find it on Gibson's site. It doesn't use the "slab of ash" phrase that Sam Ash does, but: http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electri ... ender.aspx
I had to find it on Gibson's site. It doesn't use the "slab of ash" phrase that Sam Ash does, but: http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electri ... ender.aspx
- Tim
-
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:45 am
- Location: Central Highlands, Australia
Re: Gibson - why?
asphalt-abate wrote:3. Because precious attempts to break into the Fender market have failed but this time, well this time it will be different. Introducing the Fender killer!
-Jamie
-
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:02 am
- Location: Europe/Austria
Re: Gibson - why?
That bridge looks familiar:
I too thought that's a joke, at least by Gibson itself, but it seems to be real:
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhpoD8ZwWU8[/video]
I too thought that's a joke, at least by Gibson itself, but it seems to be real:
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhpoD8ZwWU8[/video]
-
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:44 am
- Location: England
Re: Gibson - why?
Ouch! That sounds evil, and not in a good way.
It doesn't help that some of the notes don't speak, some are out of time, and some are out of tune. That is fairly common for 21C internet guitarism.
But the instrument is sadly short on character, although the demo hardly gives it any sort of chance. The only really musical tone is at the beginning, just a light valviness like a fat Tele; right after that it made me turn the mac down quick in case my missus thought I'd had a (late) midlife weirdness moment.
And (edit) anyone contemplating a B-bender should know that it sounds wonderfully better than that revolting effort in the video; that was just insultingly casually downright horrible.
It doesn't help that some of the notes don't speak, some are out of time, and some are out of tune. That is fairly common for 21C internet guitarism.
But the instrument is sadly short on character, although the demo hardly gives it any sort of chance. The only really musical tone is at the beginning, just a light valviness like a fat Tele; right after that it made me turn the mac down quick in case my missus thought I'd had a (late) midlife weirdness moment.
And (edit) anyone contemplating a B-bender should know that it sounds wonderfully better than that revolting effort in the video; that was just insultingly casually downright horrible.
-
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:02 am
- Location: Europe/Austria
Re: Gibson - why?
Oops, I'm sorry, I should have warned you.NickHorne wrote:in case my missus thought I'd had a (late) midlife weirdness moment.
-
- Posts: 2498
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:00 am
- Location: Canada's Mexico
Re: Gibson - why?
It looks like a guitar I could make with parts found on my floor .( I'd do better )
Here's a cool article...maybe with a little less testosterone Gibson might find some
graceful lines again.
Laura the Luthier / KPLU article
Here's a cool article...maybe with a little less testosterone Gibson might find some
graceful lines again.
Laura the Luthier / KPLU article
-
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:45 am
- Location: Central Highlands, Australia
Re: Gibson - why?
Miles, that video is brilliant!
A lot of tasteless 'nu-country turds' who give not only country music but music in general a bad name are playing Les Pauls and telecasters, and I imagine that this is aimed at that market with the intention of skewing it in Gibsons favour.
Here's a particularly heinous example of BAD music. Seriously, it doesn't get much worse than this. Watch at your peril.
[youtube]Rh_NKFid9Gk[/youtube]
A lot of tasteless 'nu-country turds' who give not only country music but music in general a bad name are playing Les Pauls and telecasters, and I imagine that this is aimed at that market with the intention of skewing it in Gibsons favour.
Here's a particularly heinous example of BAD music. Seriously, it doesn't get much worse than this. Watch at your peril.
[youtube]Rh_NKFid9Gk[/youtube]
-Jamie
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:10 pm
- Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Gibson - why?
I don't see why all the negative comments here about this guitar. I think it's kind of a gutsy move for Gibson. I'll probably get one down the road when I find a good used one.
What's not to like? You've got P90's, a B Bender, Tele/Strat kind of bridge, maple fingerboard...Who cares about the pickguard?
The P90's had me at hello.
Will
What's not to like? You've got P90's, a B Bender, Tele/Strat kind of bridge, maple fingerboard...Who cares about the pickguard?
The P90's had me at hello.
Will
Will Ray says - Less War, More Guitars.
-
- Posts: 3218
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:13 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St Paul
Re: Gibson - why?
Those were my thoughts also Will. I think it is the coolest Gibson I have seen in quite some time although I would like it better without a pickguard.-- Darwin
Last edited by darwinohm on Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 3:36 am
- Location: belgium
Re: Gibson - why?
+1helle-man wrote:I don't see why all the negative comments here about this guitar. I think it's kind of a gutsy move for Gibson. I'll probably get one down the road when I find a good used one.
What's not to like? You've got P90's, a B Bender, Tele/Strat kind of bridge, maple fingerboard...Who cares about the pickguard?
The P90's had me at hello.
Will
i'm with you...
-
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:02 am
- Location: Europe/Austria
Re: Gibson - why?
Hey, my Nighthawk is cool too.darwinohm wrote:Those were my thoughts also Will. I think it is the coolest Gibson I have seen in quite some time although I would like it better without a pickguard.-- Darwin
I guess, under the pickguard is some space for the B-Bender. There's no routing for it on the back side.
Picture is stolen from here:
http://www.premierguitar.com/Magazine/I ... ender.aspx
-
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:17 am
- Location: Port Angeles, WA or Oakland, CA
Re: Gibson - why?
Here's the writeup on the Gibson site: http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electri ... ender.aspx
Not bad!
Not bad!
Lefty
-
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:45 am
- Location: Central Highlands, Australia
Re: Gibson - why?
It's pretty much just the aesthetics, it would probably be a nice enough guitar to play. I just find it funny that a team of people would have worked on developing this guitar and market testing it and that the best idea for a pick guard shape was "just use the same one what's on a telecaster".helle-man wrote:I don't see why all the negative comments here about this guitar.
-Jamie
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 8:07 pm
- Location: Renton, WA
Re: Gibson - why?
Just a chance for some light hearted humor, that's all.helle-man wrote:I don't see why all the negative comments here about this guitar.
Tom
Renton, WA USA
Renton, WA USA
-
- Posts: 793
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:16 pm
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Gibson - why?
I think it's ugly, but like Will, I think it has some potential. I really miss my old 1975 LP '55 Special with its P90s. I may have to give this a try.
But it is still ugly!
Bill
But it is still ugly!
Bill
-
- Posts: 3218
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:13 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St Paul
Re: Gibson - why?
Miles Wrote:
Hey, my Nighthawk is cool too.
It is Miles, I had looked at them in the past and they're cool.
I guess, under the pickguard is some space for the B-Bender. There's no routing for it on the back side.
I agree, I would like to see how the bender is hooked up but it has to be under that pickguard. -- Darwin