Skyhawks I have known and loved
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:23 am
- Location: Monterey Cty., CA
Skyhawks I have known and loved
I had considered writing this post for a while, and after Craig’s “unrefusable offer” that I post photos of my ASAT Deluxe, I decided to meet two goals by writing about and showing Skyhawks that I have known and loved. My electric guitar preference has always been for the three single-coil Stratocaster format. During high school, I bought a new ’79 Stratocaster with money from my grocery store job.
My G&L odyssey truly began in 2007 when I bought a Custom Creations Comanche Studio 6; then 3 years later, an ASAT Jr. I restrained myself for a while, trying to keep a low budget and peace in the house, but in 2014 I bought my first Leo-era G&L: a second-generation 1988 Skyhawk with maple body, rosewood fretboard, and sickle headstock, in purple (!). When I picked it up from a local tech after some minor work, he remarked, “This is a great guitar.” I had to agree: it played effortlessly all over the thin, narrow neck (nut less than usual 1-5/8), the single-coil tones were all I ever wanted but couldn’t get from my Stratocaster for almost 30 years (sold after the Comanche arrived; no regrets), and the tone of the maple body got me closer to classic Jerry Garcia tones. This remains one of my favorite G&Ls to play. Did I mention that it’s purple?
Photo op:
This opened my eyes to Leo-era goodness. Soon enough, a maple-bodied ’88 ASAT arrived as a poor man’s Broadcaster. But the Skyhawks continued to interest me (as I pored over every entry on Greg Gagliano’s ggjaguar website), and I wanted a first-generation one. Found a 1986 in swamp ash with the ebony board I desired. This was a perfectly fine guitar with great tones and playability, yet I usually grabbed The Purple One.
Photo op: (“Trouble ahead/lady in red!”)
The trouble was that I regularly scoured the web, Reverb, and Guitar Center for used G&Ls, and gradually added several unique models…. One day, Dave’s Music Shop listed a minty, gorgeous blonde over ash Skyhawk Signature; I forwarded the link to a friend, who replied, “What are you waiting for?” My answer: I owned two Skyhawks already; if I bought a Signature, I wanted one in cherryburst. The blonde sold in 2 days. But soon after, Dave’s listed a minty 1990 Skyhawk Signature in cherryburst over ash with a maple fretboard. I sent the link to my buddy and wrote, “Well, that worked out nicely!”
This swamp ash body is quite lightweight (3.4 lbs, per pencil mark in neck pocket), which I think is a trend around that time (e.g., ASAT Classic Signature top bound); G&L must have obtained a good batch of swamp ash, the likes of which are unobtainium these days. (On the other hand, the swamp ash Comanche VI from Greg G’s collection via Mr. Roundel is noticeably heavier, despite being from 1990.) The maple fretboard has a decidedly different feel than the rosewood of The Purple One, but it’s a good feel: the frets are quite low (common around this time, in my limited experience), the action is low and slinky, and the overall tone of the guitar is clear, spanky, and articulate. Maybe this guitar came from a collection or old dealer stock: you can see the different color from the “Made in USA” sticker on the protective plastic that remained on the pickguard for a long time, and the back of the neck is lighter behind the first fret than up the neck, from UV exposure or a hanger?
Photo op (from dealer's listing):
Six months later, Guitar Center listed a late model Skyhawk with the fine tuner bridge (third version), and that feature plus the going price was enough for me to buy it. I picked it up from a GC store when we had a winery gig nearby, and showed it to my guitar partner…. Mint condition, swamp ash, maple fretboard, fine tuner bridge but nonlocking nut, and the neck that belongs to a “Signature” Skyhawk but the body had no signature! Turns out that the heavy, three-piece body was stamped 1988, but the neck was stamped one week after Leo’s death in 1991. My conjectures are perhaps an influx of orders after Leo’s passing, and/or Dale Hyatt foreseeing the future and trying to build as many guitars as possible, maybe even from parts sitting around such as this pre-“Signature” body (would have been mated to a sickle headstock neck) that maybe was set aside as too heavy? Can anyone shed a light on G&L history at this time?
Anyway, this guitar had a wider, 1-3/4 inch nut and much taller frets than I had seen on a G&L. One of my acoustics has that nut width, so I’m familiar with it. But, after a few minutes playing this Skyhawk, the width was forgotten—the strings had so much snap, such great attack and tone, and the playability up and down the fretboard was simply outstanding! What a guitar!! A little later, I loaned it to my guitar partner/bandmate (see above), whom I had already corrupted with an ASAT Classic Signature, his first G&L after an ’80s Fender Japan Stratocaster, a late ’80s Gibson 335, and two PRS. He returned the Skyhawk a few weeks later, saying, “This is too good to keep away from you this long.” I responded, “If you like it and want it, I’d happily sell it to you.” We agreed, and he’s loved it since. Kicked his Fender to the curb.
Photo op:
Soon after, because I “suddenly” owned around a dozen G&Ls, I thought I should further reduce the redundancies (ha!) of four Skyhawks despite their different wood combos, so I sold the red Skyhawk to a happy buyer. Now it was only The Purple One and the Signature.
I’ve been tempted by many Skyhawks before and since, some in great condition, some with unfortunate molestations, and some with head-scratching prices… I did well for a long time, but in early 2020 (pre COVID), a first-generation Skyhawk with a mahogany body caught my eye. I love the warm tone of mahogany, in acoustics and in G&Ls (e.g., ASAT Jr., ASAT Super), and the mahogany S-500s and F-100s always tempt me (especially in three-tone sunburst). A closer look at photos showed a sanded neck (hmm, unappealing) and some finish chips on the bottom (use a guitar stand!), but a quite low serial number for a Skyhawk. I thought it could be an early Skyhawk with a Nighthawk body; that, the mahogany, and the price were enough for me to click the button. Sure enough, the body date is mid-1983 while the neck is January 1984, when the name change occurred. This guitar’s tone is quite pleasing and distinct from the others—the mahogany adds warmth and smooths the trebles beautifully. The maple neck is comfortable, and the sanded finish is barely discernible to my touch. Three-tone sunburst and matching headstock add to the beauty, especially after I cleaned away the accumulated grime.
Photo op:
So, “That’s how it stands today/You decide if he was wise.” Three Skyhawks, each unique in wood combos, tones, but all excellent, S-type guitars. I can’t recommend this model enough to those who like S-type guitars but crave more tone, which these pickups deliver. Plus: PTB circuit!
For another view: I did buy a Fender Robert Cray Stratocaster (made in Mexico) recently, upon repeated urging from the reliable ToneQuest Report, and it does a far better Strat than my old ’79. Robert Cray had a say in the pickup design for this guitar, and they are said to be among the best Stratocaster pickups that the F company makes. They do sound good; or as another music partner said, “Did you replace the pickups in that guitar?” I’ve been using it for a weekly outdoor gig in adverse weather. I still prefer Skyhawk pickups for their wider frequency spectrum. And: I’ve only ever played three or four modern S-500s, U.S. and Tribute, which didn’t capture my ear as much. I haven’t explored the Leo-era S-500 yet…
My G&L odyssey truly began in 2007 when I bought a Custom Creations Comanche Studio 6; then 3 years later, an ASAT Jr. I restrained myself for a while, trying to keep a low budget and peace in the house, but in 2014 I bought my first Leo-era G&L: a second-generation 1988 Skyhawk with maple body, rosewood fretboard, and sickle headstock, in purple (!). When I picked it up from a local tech after some minor work, he remarked, “This is a great guitar.” I had to agree: it played effortlessly all over the thin, narrow neck (nut less than usual 1-5/8), the single-coil tones were all I ever wanted but couldn’t get from my Stratocaster for almost 30 years (sold after the Comanche arrived; no regrets), and the tone of the maple body got me closer to classic Jerry Garcia tones. This remains one of my favorite G&Ls to play. Did I mention that it’s purple?
Photo op:
This opened my eyes to Leo-era goodness. Soon enough, a maple-bodied ’88 ASAT arrived as a poor man’s Broadcaster. But the Skyhawks continued to interest me (as I pored over every entry on Greg Gagliano’s ggjaguar website), and I wanted a first-generation one. Found a 1986 in swamp ash with the ebony board I desired. This was a perfectly fine guitar with great tones and playability, yet I usually grabbed The Purple One.
Photo op: (“Trouble ahead/lady in red!”)
The trouble was that I regularly scoured the web, Reverb, and Guitar Center for used G&Ls, and gradually added several unique models…. One day, Dave’s Music Shop listed a minty, gorgeous blonde over ash Skyhawk Signature; I forwarded the link to a friend, who replied, “What are you waiting for?” My answer: I owned two Skyhawks already; if I bought a Signature, I wanted one in cherryburst. The blonde sold in 2 days. But soon after, Dave’s listed a minty 1990 Skyhawk Signature in cherryburst over ash with a maple fretboard. I sent the link to my buddy and wrote, “Well, that worked out nicely!”
This swamp ash body is quite lightweight (3.4 lbs, per pencil mark in neck pocket), which I think is a trend around that time (e.g., ASAT Classic Signature top bound); G&L must have obtained a good batch of swamp ash, the likes of which are unobtainium these days. (On the other hand, the swamp ash Comanche VI from Greg G’s collection via Mr. Roundel is noticeably heavier, despite being from 1990.) The maple fretboard has a decidedly different feel than the rosewood of The Purple One, but it’s a good feel: the frets are quite low (common around this time, in my limited experience), the action is low and slinky, and the overall tone of the guitar is clear, spanky, and articulate. Maybe this guitar came from a collection or old dealer stock: you can see the different color from the “Made in USA” sticker on the protective plastic that remained on the pickguard for a long time, and the back of the neck is lighter behind the first fret than up the neck, from UV exposure or a hanger?
Photo op (from dealer's listing):
Six months later, Guitar Center listed a late model Skyhawk with the fine tuner bridge (third version), and that feature plus the going price was enough for me to buy it. I picked it up from a GC store when we had a winery gig nearby, and showed it to my guitar partner…. Mint condition, swamp ash, maple fretboard, fine tuner bridge but nonlocking nut, and the neck that belongs to a “Signature” Skyhawk but the body had no signature! Turns out that the heavy, three-piece body was stamped 1988, but the neck was stamped one week after Leo’s death in 1991. My conjectures are perhaps an influx of orders after Leo’s passing, and/or Dale Hyatt foreseeing the future and trying to build as many guitars as possible, maybe even from parts sitting around such as this pre-“Signature” body (would have been mated to a sickle headstock neck) that maybe was set aside as too heavy? Can anyone shed a light on G&L history at this time?
Anyway, this guitar had a wider, 1-3/4 inch nut and much taller frets than I had seen on a G&L. One of my acoustics has that nut width, so I’m familiar with it. But, after a few minutes playing this Skyhawk, the width was forgotten—the strings had so much snap, such great attack and tone, and the playability up and down the fretboard was simply outstanding! What a guitar!! A little later, I loaned it to my guitar partner/bandmate (see above), whom I had already corrupted with an ASAT Classic Signature, his first G&L after an ’80s Fender Japan Stratocaster, a late ’80s Gibson 335, and two PRS. He returned the Skyhawk a few weeks later, saying, “This is too good to keep away from you this long.” I responded, “If you like it and want it, I’d happily sell it to you.” We agreed, and he’s loved it since. Kicked his Fender to the curb.
Photo op:
Soon after, because I “suddenly” owned around a dozen G&Ls, I thought I should further reduce the redundancies (ha!) of four Skyhawks despite their different wood combos, so I sold the red Skyhawk to a happy buyer. Now it was only The Purple One and the Signature.
I’ve been tempted by many Skyhawks before and since, some in great condition, some with unfortunate molestations, and some with head-scratching prices… I did well for a long time, but in early 2020 (pre COVID), a first-generation Skyhawk with a mahogany body caught my eye. I love the warm tone of mahogany, in acoustics and in G&Ls (e.g., ASAT Jr., ASAT Super), and the mahogany S-500s and F-100s always tempt me (especially in three-tone sunburst). A closer look at photos showed a sanded neck (hmm, unappealing) and some finish chips on the bottom (use a guitar stand!), but a quite low serial number for a Skyhawk. I thought it could be an early Skyhawk with a Nighthawk body; that, the mahogany, and the price were enough for me to click the button. Sure enough, the body date is mid-1983 while the neck is January 1984, when the name change occurred. This guitar’s tone is quite pleasing and distinct from the others—the mahogany adds warmth and smooths the trebles beautifully. The maple neck is comfortable, and the sanded finish is barely discernible to my touch. Three-tone sunburst and matching headstock add to the beauty, especially after I cleaned away the accumulated grime.
Photo op:
So, “That’s how it stands today/You decide if he was wise.” Three Skyhawks, each unique in wood combos, tones, but all excellent, S-type guitars. I can’t recommend this model enough to those who like S-type guitars but crave more tone, which these pickups deliver. Plus: PTB circuit!
For another view: I did buy a Fender Robert Cray Stratocaster (made in Mexico) recently, upon repeated urging from the reliable ToneQuest Report, and it does a far better Strat than my old ’79. Robert Cray had a say in the pickup design for this guitar, and they are said to be among the best Stratocaster pickups that the F company makes. They do sound good; or as another music partner said, “Did you replace the pickups in that guitar?” I’ve been using it for a weekly outdoor gig in adverse weather. I still prefer Skyhawk pickups for their wider frequency spectrum. And: I’ve only ever played three or four modern S-500s, U.S. and Tribute, which didn’t capture my ear as much. I haven’t explored the Leo-era S-500 yet…
Last edited by tomanche on Sun May 14, 2023 9:11 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:08 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
Thanks for sharing Tom!
I like every. last. one. of those. Though I fancy that signature model the most (I'm a sucker for a sweet looking burst).
I like every. last. one. of those. Though I fancy that signature model the most (I'm a sucker for a sweet looking burst).
G & L: '08 Comanche (Tribute) | '14 ASAT Classic | '00 ASAT Spec | '21 JB2 (Tribute)
Other: '87 Strat | '05 Heritage CH-157 | '12 Tele Select Koa | '19 MJT Esquire | '18 Taylor | 2015 Chrome Epi Dobro |
Other: '87 Strat | '05 Heritage CH-157 | '12 Tele Select Koa | '19 MJT Esquire | '18 Taylor | 2015 Chrome Epi Dobro |
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:59 am
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
Yes the maple/mahogany example is nice. They are all great examples.
We have Skyhawk GO23159 in purple and a sickle. Yours is the first other one I have seen.
The Skyhawk, Nighthawk and S-500 are killer guitars. Show more!
y2kc
We have Skyhawk GO23159 in purple and a sickle. Yours is the first other one I have seen.
The Skyhawk, Nighthawk and S-500 are killer guitars. Show more!
y2kc
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:23 am
- Location: Monterey Cty., CA
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
Dan, thanks! It doesn't hurt that the cherryburst has a pro shot/lighting.
y2kc, I never knew there was another purple Skyhawk. Cool! It's not in the Registry... only a few purple instruments from that era are. Photos?
y2kc, I never knew there was another purple Skyhawk. Cool! It's not in the Registry... only a few purple instruments from that era are. Photos?
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:15 am
- Location: British Columbia
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
They are all great looking guitars, I like your former red one with the ebony board the most with the purple a close runner up. I hope to someday play a Leo era Skyhawk so I can compare it to my 2002 S-500.
Paul
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:00 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
A fine set of sublime guitars.
- Jos
- Jos
-
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:38 am
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
You got a pretty…set of guitars there!
Even the though I’m an ASAT guy, something about that red one speaks to me. Whoever has it now is surely making her sing.
Even the though I’m an ASAT guy, something about that red one speaks to me. Whoever has it now is surely making her sing.
Cya,
Sam
Sam
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:23 am
- Location: Monterey Cty., CA
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
Thanks glv, Jos, and Sam for looking and responding. I encourage anyone who hasn't tried one to give it a shot. I'm glad that Jos has joined the Skyhawk camp in the past few years. Interesting that the red one has caught so much attention. I sold it to a long-time G&L collector and restorer. If he doesn't mind, I'll link to a Soundcloud recording, made shortly after he bought the guitar, that is aptly titled "The Red One":
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:59 am
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
Without photo's my guitars do not exist.
I purchased this purple Skyhawk 30 years ago. I also have a dead mint purple Rampage with a Leo Fine tuner.
These purple finishes worked. They tried a purple on sc-3's that failed. I think those are my only purple people eaters.
Why would a strat lover not like S-500's, Nighthawks and Skyhawks. No they do not sound like a strat like
the George Fullerton Model, they have have a hi-fi sound of their own. You can dial them easily to your liking.
G&L's have a slightly different voice. Leo was not done tinkering and the small population that has discovered these
guitars appreciates that fact. Until the end he was enjoying what he did.
There is picture of Leo on his yacht still wearing his pocket protector. He never stopped tinkering.
This set of Skyhawks you have is awesome.
y2kc
I purchased this purple Skyhawk 30 years ago. I also have a dead mint purple Rampage with a Leo Fine tuner.
These purple finishes worked. They tried a purple on sc-3's that failed. I think those are my only purple people eaters.
Why would a strat lover not like S-500's, Nighthawks and Skyhawks. No they do not sound like a strat like
the George Fullerton Model, they have have a hi-fi sound of their own. You can dial them easily to your liking.
G&L's have a slightly different voice. Leo was not done tinkering and the small population that has discovered these
guitars appreciates that fact. Until the end he was enjoying what he did.
There is picture of Leo on his yacht still wearing his pocket protector. He never stopped tinkering.
This set of Skyhawks you have is awesome.
y2kc
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:23 am
- Location: Monterey Cty., CA
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
That Rampage sounds cool. I know purple was on the price list (1988) but how many guitars (or basses) were possibly ordered/built? Only four or so from that era appear in the Registry.y2kc wrote:Why would a strat lover not like S-500's, Nighthawks and Skyhawks. No they do not sound like a strat like
the George Fullerton Model, they have have a hi-fi sound of their own. You can dial them easily to your liking.
G&L's have a slightly different voice. Leo was not done tinkering and the small population that has discovered these
guitars appreciates that fact. Until the end he was enjoying what he did.
Then there are the legendary or apocryphal purple Broadcasters for Prince... I believe they don't exist. Are they in the logbook?
I don't know why a Strat lover wouldn't like the Skyhawk, but some people want to hear a certain tone, which I understand. Actually, my purple Skyhawk had been crudely routed for Fender pickups, so someone clearly didn't want what the stock pups were delivering.
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2017 6:02 pm
- Location: Northern Michigan
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
Beautiful guitars, The Red One sounds good too.
-
- Posts: 981
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:52 am
- Location: Delaware
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
beautiful collection, Tomanche!
there is something special about these old skyhawks. i scored this one for $735 + ship back in 2017 from Killer Vintage gtr's in St Louis.
body: 12/83, neck 1/14/84. pretty sure it is a maple body. 7.5 radius. some stripy ebony fretboard. well broken-in vibrato.
it's been played, but man it feels and plays so sweet, and the sound from those single coil mfd's is heaven.
i'm sayin the old 50's strats can't be much better!
there is something special about these old skyhawks. i scored this one for $735 + ship back in 2017 from Killer Vintage gtr's in St Louis.
body: 12/83, neck 1/14/84. pretty sure it is a maple body. 7.5 radius. some stripy ebony fretboard. well broken-in vibrato.
it's been played, but man it feels and plays so sweet, and the sound from those single coil mfd's is heaven.
i'm sayin the old 50's strats can't be much better!
john o
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:23 am
- Location: Monterey Cty., CA
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
Sweet! Per Cesar Diaz, “Black guitars sound better.”
Re: 50s Fenders, I’m cautious about claiming that. I will say it’s a better mouse trap.
Re: 50s Fenders, I’m cautious about claiming that. I will say it’s a better mouse trap.
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:59 am
Re: Skyhawks I have known and loved
Yes I sure would like to see a purple Broadcaster. Heritage also made a guitar for Prince that I have seen in photo of his studio. I did not see
the Broadcasters.
I recently set this purple Rampage up and it just isn't my cup of tea. Some guitars are not meant be played by me. It is a beautiful
example but we are not suited for each other. The raw neck is fantastic but the Schaller humbucker in this case is uninspiring.
If it wasn't so pristine I would yank the pu and replace it with something more exciting. It is a beauty. GO23480
the Broadcasters.
I recently set this purple Rampage up and it just isn't my cup of tea. Some guitars are not meant be played by me. It is a beautiful
example but we are not suited for each other. The raw neck is fantastic but the Schaller humbucker in this case is uninspiring.
If it wasn't so pristine I would yank the pu and replace it with something more exciting. It is a beauty. GO23480