1987 ASAT vs CLF Centennial

The place to discuss, post photos, video, and audio of the G&L instruments produced from 1980 to 1991, including the amps & gear we use with them.
User avatar
maverick927
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:00 am

1987 ASAT vs CLF Centennial

Post by maverick927 »

Hey guys,

I'm looking at either a 1987 ASAT in excellent condition or a C.L.F. Centennial ASAT in blonde. The '87 ASAT has a rosewood fretboard, and of course the Centennial has a maple fretboard. I see a lot of the appointments to the Centennial are very similar to the '87. The Centennial has medium/jumbo frets where the vintage ASAT's usually had thinner wire. Zinc bridge and hardware appears to be the same. Also, I've read that vintage MFD's have less winds than the newer MFD's which will change the tone and output to an extent.

Question is - what else will be different between the two? I've read that older ASAT's could have maple bodies vs the swamp ash on the Centennial. Price wise, the Centennial is about $150 more than the '87 ASAT.

Any other opinions on which to go with?

Thanks,

Mav
Last edited by maverick927 on Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Craig
Site Admin
Posts: 11349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:52 am
Location: Either Coto De Caza, CA or Paso Robles, CA

Re: 1986 ASAT vs CLF Centennial

Post by Craig »

maverick927 wrote:Hey guys,

I'm looking at either a 1986 ASAT in excellent condition or a C.L.F. Centennial ASAT in blonde. The '86 ASAT has a rosewood fretboard, and of course the Centennial has a maple fretboard. I see a lot of the appointments to the Centennial are very similar to the '86. The Centennial has medium/jumbo frets where the vintage ASAT's usually had thinner wire. Zinc bridge and hardware appears to be the same.

Question is - what else will be different between the two? I've read that older ASAT's could have maple bodies vs the swamp ash on the Centennial. Price wise, the Centennial is about $150 more than the '86 ASAT.

Any other opinions on which to go with?

Thanks,

Mav
No question, go for the '86 ASAT, it would have a Maple body.

See: List of Regular Production ASAT-style guitars (USA) and List of Special Edition & Non-Production ASAT-style guitars.

:ugeek:
--Craig [co-webmaster of guitarsbyleo.com, since Oct. 16, 2000]
Welcome! Read This First
Got a G&L question? Check out the: G&L Knowledgebase
Current G&L Specifications and Options
User avatar
maverick927
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:00 am

Re: 1986 ASAT vs CLF Centennial

Post by maverick927 »

Craig wrote:
maverick927 wrote:Hey guys,

I'm looking at either a 1986 ASAT in excellent condition or a C.L.F. Centennial ASAT in blonde. The '86 ASAT has a rosewood fretboard, and of course the Centennial has a maple fretboard. I see a lot of the appointments to the Centennial are very similar to the '86. The Centennial has medium/jumbo frets where the vintage ASAT's usually had thinner wire. Zinc bridge and hardware appears to be the same.

Question is - what else will be different between the two? I've read that older ASAT's could have maple bodies vs the swamp ash on the Centennial. Price wise, the Centennial is about $150 more than the '86 ASAT.

Any other opinions on which to go with?

Thanks,

Mav
No question, go for the '86 ASAT, it would have a Maple body.

See: List of Regular Production ASAT-style guitars (USA) and List of Special Edition & Non-Production ASAT-style guitars.

:ugeek:
Thanks Craig. I was leaning that direction. Wanted to be sure I wasn't missing anything else on the Centennial.

Mav
User avatar
maverick927
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:00 am

Re: 1987 ASAT vs CLF Centennial

Post by maverick927 »

Correction - it is an '87 ASAT, not '86. Don't think this makes a difference in materials used.
User avatar
KenC
Posts: 2344
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:18 pm
Location: None of the above

Re: 1987 ASAT vs CLF Centennial

Post by KenC »

An '86 or '87 ASAT won't necessarily have a maple body. I've owned both years, in maple and ash. Although I am definitely a fan of maple bodies on '80s G&Ls, none of my ash versions (ASAT, ASAT III and ASAT Classic) are lacking in the tone department.

I am not an expert on fret wire, and I don't play a lot of guitars that aren't older G&Ls, but I would not call the fret wire on any of the 1980s G&Ls I've owned "thin".

An '87 ASAT is a wonderful instrument. I haven't played a Centennial, but as I understand it was basically a limited edition copy of an early ASAT. Might as well go with the original, unless the Centennial's cosmetics are more to your liking. Keep in mind that Blonde was always over ash, even in the mid-'80s. Solid White finishes from those days tend to be about the same shade as a Blonde now, and could be over ash or maple.

I've never priced Centennials, but the couple I've stumbled across recently were all north of $1,000. It's not too hard to find an '86 or '87 ASAT in very nice condition in the $800-$900 range. A $150 difference between the two guitars you're looking at might indicate that the '87 is priced a bit high, or the Centennial a bit low.

Ken
User avatar
Elwood
Posts: 2498
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:00 am
Location: Canada's Mexico

Re: 1987 ASAT vs CLF Centennial

Post by Elwood »

KenC wrote:An '86 or '87 ASAT won't necessarily have a maple body. I've owned both years, in maple and ash.
Right, here's an obviously Ash '86

Image
y2kc
Posts: 650
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:59 am

Re: 1987 ASAT vs CLF Centennial

Post by y2kc »

Mav,

I would get the 87 over the Centennial. But having said that, I would play the 87 and make sure it is good to go. If it is not to your liking, there are many more out there. Take your time and find a keeper.

y2kc