Preferred fingerboard radius with Slim C?

The place to discuss, post photos, video, and audio of the G&L products (US instruments, stomp boxes, etc.) produced after 1991, including the amps & gear we use with them.
kdl6769
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 2:16 pm

Preferred fingerboard radius with Slim C?

Post by kdl6769 »

I am in the process of ordering a Fallout and wondered if people had a view on whether a 9.5 or 12" radius would be preferable. I'm neither a shredder nor exclusively a chorder, although I do have fairly small hands. I was thinking that the combo of Slim C (1 5/8 nut) with the flatter fingerboard would be a good blend, but welcome additional thoughts. The guitars with which I have most experience are a Rickenbacker 330 and a made in Japan Epiphone Sheraton from 1980 (sort of a poor man's ES-335). Both have pretty comfortable necks from my perspective, but I don't know what the radius is of either (I am guessing the Rick is no more than 10 and the Epi is 10 or 12).
trem
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:44 pm

Re: Preferred fingerboard radius with Slim C?

Post by trem »

It's all really just personal preference. For example, Yngwie plays on a neck that is way thicker and rounder fingerboard than say an Ibanez or Jackson super-thin necks and 18" fingerboards that most shredders prefer, and Gilmour plays large bends on a really round fingerboard that most bendy types don't prefer.

I have a modern classic, which is a slim c but a 1/16th of an inch wider at the nut, in a 9.5. I don't like the 9.5 because the action has to be set higher than I like it to get even just a whole step without fretting-out or buzzing, and I have to go a bit higher for 2 and 2.5 step bends. I'm going to re-radius the board when I get a chance. Oddly enough, the higher action doesn't bother me for lead work, it's the chording, and I could live with it, but I'm not going to.

You just need to figure out what works for you, as I don't think the difference in radius feel between 9.5 and 12 (at the same string height) would be as noticeable as say, the difference between 7.5 and 9.5 would be.
trem
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:44 pm

Re: Preferred fingerboard radius with Slim C?

Post by trem »

Sorry, but a rounder radius being great for smaller hands (unless he's a month 1 beginner attempting barre chords) is about as substantive as thin and flat necks are great for shredding, but yeah, it replicates a vintage Fender for feel and playability, for sure, but I've seen 9-year-olds with smaller than average hands for their age on a 16" radius that had no problems at all. If you don't mind highish action to clear your bends and prefer a rounder fingerboard, then go with a rounder radius. Again, it's such a personal preference that you need to try different radiuses with similar neck profiles to see which you prefer if you don't want to guesstimate.
kdl6769
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 2:16 pm

Re: Preferred fingerboard radius with Slim C?

Post by kdl6769 »

Thanks. My experience has been in the 9.5 to 12 realm on electrics (and obviously flatter with accoustics). I was really just wondering if there's a relationship between neck thickness, nut width and radius - for example, having smallish hands I prefer the Slim C/Modern C to the Classic C, and wondered if a slimmer neck profile gave one a little more latitude to go flatter on the fingerboard without sacrificing playability.
trem
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:44 pm

Re: Preferred fingerboard radius with Slim C?

Post by trem »

kdl6769 wrote:Thanks. My experience has been in the 9.5 to 12 realm on electrics (and obviously flatter with accoustics). I was really just wondering if there's a relationship between neck thickness, nut width and radius - for example, having smallish hands I prefer the Slim C/Modern C to the Classic C, and wondered if a slimmer neck profile gave one a little more latitude to go flatter on the fingerboard without sacrificing playability.
You need to define how a flat fingerboard sacrifices playability. Traditional classical guitars have thick and wide necks with no radius on the fingerboard, and banjos have thin and narrow necks with no radius (most, anyway) - basically polar opposites in terms of neck width and thickness, but both have a completely flat board. Conversely, violins and cellos etc., are really round, around a 2.5" radius. The fingerboard design for all of these instruments was developed to accommodate the picking/bowing hand and not the fingering hand. I don't believe the difference in thickness between a slim and classic neck is substantial enough to influence one's preference in fingerboard radius.
pjr114
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 6:34 am

Re: Preferred fingerboard radius with Slim C?

Post by pjr114 »

I have a Bluesboy 90 with a Slim C and 12" radius and I love it. It was one of the first 12s I purchased and I was a little tentative about getting it but I now prefer it over 9.5s. Also have a Fallout with a 12 and Classic C. Love that one too.

I'm surprised G&L went to 9.5s on the 2016s.