Removing the string tree

The place to discuss, post photos, video, and audio of the G&L products (US instruments, stomp boxes, etc.) produced after 1991, including the amps & gear we use with them.
Professor Plunk
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:22 am
Location: France

Removing the string tree

Post by Professor Plunk »

Hi everyone,

I've read that removing the string tree on a Fender/G&L-type headstock results in the B and E string feeling looser and being easier to bend, so I'd like to give it a shot on my Tribute ASAT Deluxe. Has anybody ever tried it? Is it safe?

Thanks!
Fumble fingers
Posts: 2153
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:11 pm
Location: Dayton , Ohio

Re: Removing the string tree

Post by Fumble fingers »

my Comanche doesn't have one on it but to be honest I never really noticed it being different for bends .... I'm just about to get the Comanche out and play for rotation cycle , I'll have to see if I can tell a difference
EmGeezer
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:25 am

Re: Removing the string tree

Post by EmGeezer »

I recently got a Comanche tribute, with the pressed metal string tree. My high E broke while I was tuning it first time (drat). Got myself Tusq string tree to replace.... nice and slippery. Also longer threaded screws so that tree acts more as a guide rather than much pull downwards. I don't do extreme bends etc so not worried about popping out of the nut. I don't know the physics of whether looser or not, but works just fine and you might try that. Makes guitar looks a little bit better, but lovely to start with.
Professor Plunk
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:22 am
Location: France

Re: Removing the string tree

Post by Professor Plunk »

Hey, it's me again. Just so you know, I removed the string tree but I don't notice any difference in "bendability", the high E string doesn't seem looser. I can get some interesting sounds by plucking the bit of string behind the nut. I'm gonna leave the guitar like that for a while, just to see how it feels...