Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:22 am
- Location: Skylands
Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
Lunch today – grilled chicken wrap with carrot sticks.
While I wish G&L would do more combinations with MFDs, one thing they are doing to keep things interesting is using alternative woods for their instruments (witness the Okoume ASAT in yesterday’s lunch report). Some of these less common woods, such as Limba (Korina) and Khaya (African Mahogany) have a strong and successful historic use in musical instruments. Others, such as Okoume and Monkeypod (Indian Walnut), are relatively new. And one in particular, Sugar Pine, was used by Leo Fender on the earliest Esquire/Telecaster guitars only to be abandoned and then re-discovered as a tonewood. Here’s a brief summary of the body tonewoods used by G&L. BTW, despite it being called “Equatorial Mahogany”, Okoume is not in the mahogany family (but Khaya is). In fact, it’s related to frankincense and myrrh!
Big Leaf Maple
Green Ash ("swamp" ash)
Honduran Mahogany
Khaya (African mahogany)
Korina
Lacewood
Monkeypod
Okoume
Red Alder
Sugar Pine
Tilia (Basswood)
Yellow Poplar
So, are you interested when G&L uses new tonewoods? Are there others you’d like to see them use? Are there any woods you dislike? For me, I think Okoume and Sugar Pine make nice sounding guitars, but the softness of the wood worries me (dings and dents). I’d like to see some of these woods topped with a maple cap, too. I don’t get the Savannah series with a limba top. Aesthetically it’s fine, but I’m not sure what it does tonally. Also, I think the use of Pau Ferro is great. Bassists have known about it for a long time and it’s a great alternative to ebony.
Tomorrow I’ll try to do something for the bass players.
GG
While I wish G&L would do more combinations with MFDs, one thing they are doing to keep things interesting is using alternative woods for their instruments (witness the Okoume ASAT in yesterday’s lunch report). Some of these less common woods, such as Limba (Korina) and Khaya (African Mahogany) have a strong and successful historic use in musical instruments. Others, such as Okoume and Monkeypod (Indian Walnut), are relatively new. And one in particular, Sugar Pine, was used by Leo Fender on the earliest Esquire/Telecaster guitars only to be abandoned and then re-discovered as a tonewood. Here’s a brief summary of the body tonewoods used by G&L. BTW, despite it being called “Equatorial Mahogany”, Okoume is not in the mahogany family (but Khaya is). In fact, it’s related to frankincense and myrrh!
Big Leaf Maple
Green Ash ("swamp" ash)
Honduran Mahogany
Khaya (African mahogany)
Korina
Lacewood
Monkeypod
Okoume
Red Alder
Sugar Pine
Tilia (Basswood)
Yellow Poplar
So, are you interested when G&L uses new tonewoods? Are there others you’d like to see them use? Are there any woods you dislike? For me, I think Okoume and Sugar Pine make nice sounding guitars, but the softness of the wood worries me (dings and dents). I’d like to see some of these woods topped with a maple cap, too. I don’t get the Savannah series with a limba top. Aesthetically it’s fine, but I’m not sure what it does tonally. Also, I think the use of Pau Ferro is great. Bassists have known about it for a long time and it’s a great alternative to ebony.
Tomorrow I’ll try to do something for the bass players.
GG
You can never have too many ASATs!
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:24 pm
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
My usual fresh veggies, fruit, roasted chicken.
I was just asking about pine in reply to yesterday's LR. Curious to its advantages or disadvantages.
Generally, I like hearing about new wood combos being used and ultimately, to me, is how it sounds/plays. The look/feel of different woods is quite interesting but if something is visually striking and yet does not come together soundwise, it's not worth it. For example, I have a maple body home brew with a compound neck that just sits there. Looks good but just can't find the right PU's to make it fun for me.
And don't get Bloody Fingers started on tone woods!
I was just asking about pine in reply to yesterday's LR. Curious to its advantages or disadvantages.
Generally, I like hearing about new wood combos being used and ultimately, to me, is how it sounds/plays. The look/feel of different woods is quite interesting but if something is visually striking and yet does not come together soundwise, it's not worth it. For example, I have a maple body home brew with a compound neck that just sits there. Looks good but just can't find the right PU's to make it fun for me.
And don't get Bloody Fingers started on tone woods!
-
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:38 am
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
Lunch was a quick chicken taco, now I am ready for dinner!
Tried a sugar pine alnico ASAT last year that I did like quite a bit, but found a Broadcaster same day, guess which one I have. May get a sugar pine one day, who knows. I love the look of the Lacewood ASAT Commemorative ASAT but no clue on what it sounds like. Heck, I would get it just for the look, any insight into tone and texture appreciated. I'm on the fence with spalted maple, mainly due to the look. Grain has to be just right for me. Maple has a sweet sound, so how different is "spalted"?
I have looked at koa and acacia ukeleles, maybe we could try that or a top on semi-hollow mahogany body......
Tried a sugar pine alnico ASAT last year that I did like quite a bit, but found a Broadcaster same day, guess which one I have. May get a sugar pine one day, who knows. I love the look of the Lacewood ASAT Commemorative ASAT but no clue on what it sounds like. Heck, I would get it just for the look, any insight into tone and texture appreciated. I'm on the fence with spalted maple, mainly due to the look. Grain has to be just right for me. Maple has a sweet sound, so how different is "spalted"?
I have looked at koa and acacia ukeleles, maybe we could try that or a top on semi-hollow mahogany body......
Cya,
Sam
Sam
-
- Posts: 2344
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:18 pm
- Location: None of the above
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
I don't get interested in new models very often, but I love my old maple and mahogany G&Ls - and I don't care what anybody says about that! I've seen some gorgeous new G&Ls with flamed or spalted maple tops, but they didn't trip the GAS meter at all. I came across an eBay listing for a '90s-vintage ASAT Bass with a very heavily flamed ash body that almost had me clearing out space recently.GGJaguar wrote:So, are you interested when G&L uses new tonewoods?
My wife dragged me to a craft show in Baltimore last weekend, where I saw a table made of walnut crotch and koa. That was some seriously beautiful wood. I would have liked to see that combination in a guitar or bass.
I may have mentioned this in another thread recently, but there was a very sad-looking Chinese Fender in my local Guitar Center. I don't know what the body wood was advertised as, but it was clearly a very soft Asian pine. It looked like somebody had dropped the guitar - not only was a big chunk of finish missing on one edge of the body, but the wood was compressed flat across the entire ding.GGJaguar wrote:For me, I think Okoume and Sugar Pine make nice sounding guitars, but the softness of the wood worries me (dings and dents).
Same here, especially for ash and alder. A tight, quartersawn or rift-sawn grain can be pretty sweet under the right finish, but random face grain or wide growth rings just don't do it for me.sam wrote:Grain has to be just right for me.
I don't think there should be any difference. Spalting is a cosmetic "defect" resulting from a parasite boring through the tree. The tunnel is very narrow and doesn't effect the wood's integrity, but a ring of mineral deposits surrounds it. The dark arches or "spalting" are just the appearance of the mineral rings where they cross out of the face grain. Otherwise, spalted maple is the same as any other from the same species.sam wrote:Maple has a sweet sound, so how different is "spalted"?
Ken
-
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Suburban Washington, DC
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
Hey GG. Let me just say that it is an honor.....
Regarding tonewoods, my level of playing makes it so that so the woods involved don't make much of a difference. That said, I have come to believe that MFDs may well have been designed with maple in mind. Mahogany seems special for Leo's early basses, especially the L1K. I like ash for T-style guitars, and the best S-type guitar I've ever played (a modern Legacy) features alder with a maple fretboard. I'm not a big fan of rosewood fretboards, but I have a thing for Pao Ferro and Ebony. So sue me! - ed
Regarding tonewoods, my level of playing makes it so that so the woods involved don't make much of a difference. That said, I have come to believe that MFDs may well have been designed with maple in mind. Mahogany seems special for Leo's early basses, especially the L1K. I like ash for T-style guitars, and the best S-type guitar I've ever played (a modern Legacy) features alder with a maple fretboard. I'm not a big fan of rosewood fretboards, but I have a thing for Pao Ferro and Ebony. So sue me! - ed
-
- Posts: 675
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
I have similar reservations about soft woods for guitars. Even hard woods end up with buckle rash. I don't care about the tonal influence of poly vs. nitrocellulose lacquer and I'll take the harder shinier poly too.
Interests come and go. Sometimes I have an immediate attraction to a design. Sometimes I develop interest in a look after viewing several examples of a guitar. Sometimes my interests change when I grow tired of something.
It has not been a specific wood but an interest in a more exotic design in a guitar that has been a waxing and waning interest. I am also hesitant about investing in something I am too concerned about preserving. I take care of everything. But I do not have the luxury of guitars as art for display. I have them to play more than anything. Anything "collectible" is off the radar although something that is "collectible" might be on the radar for different reasons. There are things I like about the Blondie but I'd rather have a regular guitar with that look and wiring configuration so I could play it without so much concern. I like the LE 2 for the unique pickup configuration and Autumnburst finish. I definitely don't want a wood just because it is unique = unproven.
Regarding a difference between spalted and regular maple wood, there may be no detectible difference in its tone, however, there logically ought to be because the wood is broken up by the spalting. It is a physical and cosmetic condition that can effect the strength of wood. Spalting can lighten (weight), soften and create sponginess in wood. Seems to me that if there is any difference between woods due to the usual suspects (i.e. density, hardness, etc.) the spalted aspect would have to impact the way sound resonates through a wood. Now with a cap who knows? I am not sure the wood of a cap makes a difference. I wonder if the presence of a glue seam between two pieces of wood does not have more influence than the type of wood that the cap is comprised of.
Interests come and go. Sometimes I have an immediate attraction to a design. Sometimes I develop interest in a look after viewing several examples of a guitar. Sometimes my interests change when I grow tired of something.
It has not been a specific wood but an interest in a more exotic design in a guitar that has been a waxing and waning interest. I am also hesitant about investing in something I am too concerned about preserving. I take care of everything. But I do not have the luxury of guitars as art for display. I have them to play more than anything. Anything "collectible" is off the radar although something that is "collectible" might be on the radar for different reasons. There are things I like about the Blondie but I'd rather have a regular guitar with that look and wiring configuration so I could play it without so much concern. I like the LE 2 for the unique pickup configuration and Autumnburst finish. I definitely don't want a wood just because it is unique = unproven.
Ken,KenC wrote:I don't think there should be any difference. Spalting is a cosmetic "defect" resulting from a parasite boring through the tree. The tunnel is very narrow and doesn't effect the wood's integrity, but a ring of mineral deposits surrounds it. The dark arches or "spalting" are just the appearance of the mineral rings where they cross out of the face grain. Otherwise, spalted maple is the same as any other from the same species.sam wrote:Maple has a sweet sound, so how different is "spalted"?
Regarding a difference between spalted and regular maple wood, there may be no detectible difference in its tone, however, there logically ought to be because the wood is broken up by the spalting. It is a physical and cosmetic condition that can effect the strength of wood. Spalting can lighten (weight), soften and create sponginess in wood. Seems to me that if there is any difference between woods due to the usual suspects (i.e. density, hardness, etc.) the spalted aspect would have to impact the way sound resonates through a wood. Now with a cap who knows? I am not sure the wood of a cap makes a difference. I wonder if the presence of a glue seam between two pieces of wood does not have more influence than the type of wood that the cap is comprised of.
Last edited by Salmon on Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2344
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:18 pm
- Location: None of the above
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
I used to be the same way. Not so much about Pao Ferro, but a nice vintage gloss maple board or a stained ebony board were the best in my book. The rosewood board on my Interceptor Bass was love at first sight, and I've rarely looked back...zapcosongs wrote: I'm not a big fan of rosewood fretboards, but I have a thing for Pao Ferro and Ebony. So sue me!
I was going to put some Interceptor porn here, but Photobucket is failing me yet again. Has anybody else had problems getting PB to load recently?
Ken
Edit: Photobucket decided to start working again. One day I'll take my own photos of this incredible bass, including a good close-up of the fretboard:
Ken
Last edited by KenC on Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 675
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
Not necessarily only recently but intermittently PB has often been slow and has not behaved like I expected it to.
-
- Posts: 2344
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:18 pm
- Location: None of the above
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
I was speaking (typing?) from my own limited experience woodworking with spalted maple. The things you describe could absolutely be true, but the couple of times I've worked with spalted maple I haven't noticed them. I just ran down to the basement to check on about 20 board feet of spalted/flamed hard maple that's been getting nice and seasoned for about five years. The boards are sanded on two sides. On the rough face, I can definitely feel a change in surface texture inside the spalting lines. On the sanded face, I can barely feel a hint of it in some places. I tried scratching the rough face with a sharp corner of a red oak off-cut; the mark is consistent (to my eye) both inside and outside the spalting lines. I couldn't get noticeable dents in either part by pressing the corner of the piece of oak straight into the wood. I haven't noticed an obvious difference in weight between regular and spalted hard maple that came from the same lot of lumber.Salmon wrote: Regarding a difference between spalted and regular maple wood, there may be no detectible difference in its tone, however, there logically ought to be because the wood is broken up by the spalting. It is a physical and cosmetic condition that can effect the strength of wood. Spalting can lighten (weight), soften and create sponginess in wood. Seems to me that if there is any difference between woods due to the usual suspects (i.e. density, hardness, etc.) the spalted aspect would have to impact the way sound resonates through a wood.
The board I checked has been destined to become a set of drawer fronts on an old (1800s?) pine dresser I rescued from a neighbor's garbage. I must admit that I was having visions of a thick maple cap on a bass body a couple of minutes ago...
I was wondering about that during a recent thread about body woods. It would be interesting to measure how deeply the bridge's vibrations travel into the body. It could be that any dampening effect is in the first couple of millimeters.Salmon wrote:I am not sure the wood of a cap makes a difference.
The old marketing claim about Titebond (a standard furniture maker's glue for many years) is that the joint will be stronger than the wood on either side. I remember a series of tests published in Fine Woodworking several years ago, where different table leg joints were compared by building tables under standardized conditions and then loading them until they collapsed. IIRC, in all cases it was the wood that failed rather than the joint. I've had the same thing happen when failed projects have been turned into kindling. The glue layer is an entirely different animal than the woods it's joining.Salmon wrote:I wonder if the presence of a glue seam between two pieces of wood does not have more influence than the type of wood that the cap is comprised of.
That layer of resin soaked into the pores has to be very different acoustically than the wood on either side. At least that's my unscientific conclusion...
Ken
-
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Suburban Washington, DC
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
That's stunning! Enjoy!!! - edKenC wrote:I used to be the same way. Not so much about Pao Ferro, but a nice vintage gloss maple board or a stained ebony board were the best in my book. The rosewood board on my Interceptor Bass was love at first sight, and I've rarely looked back...zapcosongs wrote: I'm not a big fan of rosewood fretboards, but I have a thing for Pao Ferro and Ebony. So sue me!
I was going to put some Interceptor porn here, but Photobucket is failing me yet again. Has anybody else had problems getting PB to load recently?
Ken
Edit: Photobucket decided to start working again. One day I'll take my own photos of this incredible bass, including a good close-up of the fretboard:
Ken
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:52 am
- Location: Either Coto De Caza, CA or Paso Robles, CA
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
Here's a few more to add to your list:GGJaguar wrote:Lunch today – grilled chicken wrap with carrot sticks.
While I wish G&L would do more combinations with MFDs, one thing they are doing to keep things interesting is using alternative woods for their instruments (witness the Okoume ASAT in yesterday’s lunch report). Some of these less common woods, such as Limba (Korina) and Khaya (African Mahogany) have a strong and successful historic use in musical instruments. Others, such as Okoume and Monkeypod (Indian Walnut), are relatively new. And one in particular, Sugar Pine, was used by Leo Fender on the earliest Esquire/Telecaster guitars only to be abandoned and then re-discovered as a tonewood. Here’s a brief summary of the body tonewoods used by G&L. BTW, despite it being called “Equatorial Mahogany”, Okoume is not in the mahogany family (but Khaya is). In fact, it’s related to frankincense and myrrh!
Big Leaf Maple
Green Ash ("swamp" ash)
Honduran Mahogany
Khaya (African mahogany)
Korina
Lacewood
Monkeypod
Okoume
Red Alder
Sugar Pine
Tilia (Basswood)
Yellow Poplar
So, are you interested when G&L uses new tonewoods? Are there others you’d like to see them use? Are there any woods you dislike? For me, I think Okoume and Sugar Pine make nice sounding guitars, but the softness of the wood worries me (dings and dents). I’d like to see some of these woods topped with a maple cap, too. I don’t get the Savannah series with a limba top. Aesthetically it’s fine, but I’m not sure what it does tonally. Also, I think the use of Pau Ferro is great. Bassists have known about it for a long time and it’s a great alternative to ebony.
Tomorrow I’ll try to do something for the bass players.
GG
Spalted Maple
Spalted Alder (see G&L prototypes: guitars and basses)
Koa (top on an ASAT Deluxe with Chambered Honduran Mahogany Body - one-off for Hawaii Music Supply)
Dark Korina (Black Limba) (see G&L prototypes: guitars and basses)
Zebrawood
The Grand Ole Opry stage floor top on an ASAT Bass. (Not sure what wood(s) it has)
These combined lists will make it's way to the G&L Knowledgebase soon.
--Craig [co-webmaster of guitarsbyleo.com, since Oct. 16, 2000]
Welcome! Read This First
Got a G&L question? Check out the: G&L Knowledgebase
Current G&L Specifications and Options
Welcome! Read This First
Got a G&L question? Check out the: G&L Knowledgebase
Current G&L Specifications and Options
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 8:22 pm
- Location: Near Seattle, WA
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
I was really impressed with the Okoume in the savannah collection. Great sounds in every one I've played
Lunch was a baconator. The rest of the day was getting over the baconator
Lunch was a baconator. The rest of the day was getting over the baconator
-
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:38 am
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
Thanks Craig,
I had forgotten how great the zebrawood looks, and the koa has a certain elegance to it as well.
I have early morning GAS!
I had forgotten how great the zebrawood looks, and the koa has a certain elegance to it as well.
I have early morning GAS!
Cya,
Sam
Sam
-
- Posts: 3218
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:13 pm
- Location: Minneapolis/St Paul
Re: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Lunch Report
Greg, the woods used by G&L have been an attraction for me. I have several different ones and that is what makes these G&Ls stand out for me. Their Swamp Ash has always been stunning but some of the new ones really do it. I love the Western Pine in my launch edition. The latest mahoganys and okoume are spectacular. -- Darwin