Ash vs alder

The place to discuss, post photos, video, and audio of the G&L products (US instruments, stomp boxes, etc.) produced after 1991, including the amps & gear we use with them.
swjake83
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 10:46 am

Ash vs alder

Post by swjake83 »

Aside from cosmetics, what are the tonal differences in ash and alder. I have heard ash resonates better, but not sure if this is the case. I know it is always an upgrade on price from alder so is it all about the grain or does it sound better also?

Thanks
User avatar
yowhatsshakin
Posts: 3340
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:00 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Ash vs alder

Post by yowhatsshakin »

swjake83 wrote:Aside from cosmetics, what are the tonal differences in ash and alder. I have heard ash resonates better, but not sure if this is the case. I know it is always an upgrade on price from alder so is it all about the grain or does it sound better also?

Thanks
Here's a great page on different tonewoods.
- Jos

Image
sirmyghin
Posts: 1516
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:30 pm
Location: Ontario,Canada

Re: Ash vs alder

Post by sirmyghin »

ash has a more pronounced grain than alder and is typically heavier than alder. I think it looks nicer. I am not a subscribed to the effects of tonewood being terribly noticable.
User avatar
Jaystrings
Posts: 121
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:19 pm

Re: Ash vs alder

Post by Jaystrings »

I can't always hear a difference in tone - BUT, when I do it is most dramatic on my 80s ASATs. I cannot explain it, but the tone quality, resonance, & sustain seem best on the ones with ash, not quite as good on the ones with alder, and least so on the ones with maple bodies. Go figure. On other brands, other years, other models, etc, I don't hear much difference. More likely to find a weight difference than tonal difference. I must say that the grain of an ash body can be very much more pleasing to the eye - and usually is.