Ash weight?
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:35 am
Ash weight?
I finally pulled the trigger and ordered a Lecacy in Ash. What can I expect in terms of how heavy it will be? I thought I remembered someone using the phrase "boat anchor"?
-
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Ontario,Canada
Re: Ash weight?
Probably me. My new ash ASAT is a feather. The one I played in the store to confirm my custom order was a boat anchor. Ash has a highly variant density. Cross your fingers Mine is almost too light though, has slight neck dive to it.
-
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:45 am
- Location: Central Highlands, Australia
Re: Ash weight?
Expect a guitar between 6 and 10lbs. Weight really does vary hugely. Personally I could care less - I have heavy and featherweight examples, they all sound good. The heavier ones have a little more punch, to my ear anyway.
-Jamie
-
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:30 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Ash weight?
Got a boat anchor ASAT Special here.
Never been lucky enough to try a light swamp ash ASAT either.... all the one's I've ever picked up have been Les Paul heavy.
Never been lucky enough to try a light swamp ash ASAT either.... all the one's I've ever picked up have been Les Paul heavy.
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:25 am
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
Re: Ash weight?
I asked for a "lightweight" ash body when I custom ordered my butterscotch blond S-500, and got just that. It's VERY resonant, but a lot lighter than my alder ASAT Special and alder Legacy. Ask and you might receive.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:35 am
Re: Ash weight?
The guy at the shop I'm ordering from says they won't do that. I specifically asked for "lightweight ash" and he said G&L doesn't/won't do that for me.GDub wrote:I asked for a "lightweight" ash body when I custom ordered my butterscotch blond S-500, and got just that. It's VERY resonant, but a lot lighter than my alder ASAT Special and alder Legacy. Ask and you might receive.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:52 am
- Location: Either Coto De Caza, CA or Paso Robles, CA
Re: Ash weight?
Find another dealer and ask them if they could specify a lightweight ash body for an order.scolfax wrote:The guy at the shop I'm ordering from says they won't do that. I specifically asked for "lightweight ash" and he said G&L doesn't/won't do that for me.GDub wrote:I asked for a "lightweight" ash body when I custom ordered my butterscotch blond S-500, and got just that. It's VERY resonant, but a lot lighter than my alder ASAT Special and alder Legacy. Ask and you might receive.
G&L has done body weight special requests in the past. (and not just for GDub )
It's really not an unreasonable request.
just my $0.02
--Craig [co-webmaster of guitarsbyleo.com, since Oct. 16, 2000]
Welcome! Read This First
Got a G&L question? Check out the: G&L Knowledgebase
Current G&L Specifications and Options
Welcome! Read This First
Got a G&L question? Check out the: G&L Knowledgebase
Current G&L Specifications and Options
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:04 am
- Location: Stockholm Sweden
Re: Ash weight?
Actually, In general:
heavy = slowly grown = better quality wood.
Cheers
L-zr
heavy = slowly grown = better quality wood.
Cheers
L-zr
-
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:24 am
Re: Ash weight?
For what it's worth I have a late 90s Legacy Special in ash and a Legacy in alder from a couple of years ago. Both weigh exactly the same, 8.4 lbs.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:13 pm
- Location: Tasmania, Australia
Re: Ash weight?
I have two ash G&L's (A Legacy & a George Fullerton Signature)... the legacy weighs 9.2 pounds & the Fullerton weighs 7.4. There's a difference to the sound... the lighter one definitely rings & resonates more, but I find myself playing the heavy one more these days... tighter, punchier, brighter, but with nice firm lows (chimes nicely with my Vox). Both are great, and both are keepers!
-
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Ontario,Canada
Re: Ash weight?
Don't those guitars have different pickups in the offplanet? Makes the comparison kind of moot then.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:58 pm
- Location: California Coast
Re: Ash weight?
I've had real heavy ash guitars, and a real light "swamp ash" guitar (not G&L's).
My present G&L (S500) seems fairly heavy to me (but it's alder). Not extreme. Just tending towards the weighty end of things I guess. I'm OK with that. It's within a range that works with me.
I always thought where ash was grown, how much water etc., determined how "dense" (therefore heavy) it wound up being after processing.
Fashion has run the gamut (with me too) from everybody being after sustain in the seventies (remember "brassing out" your guitar?), therefore heavy was in, as it was thought at the time that the less the guitar's structure absorbed in frequencies - the more sustain there would be: to a few years ago light bodies were all the rage because people thought there was more chime and upper harmonics available.
I think you can steer a guitar's sound to tend in a certain direction, but nothing's guaranteed obviously.
Nowadays I'm OK with about anything except extremes (in body weight: either way). I've realized that a versatile, good-sounding guitar (in the middle-of-the-road, weight-wise) gives me the most lattitude for varying strings, amps, technique, etc., to cover the various sounds and styles I want to explore.
My present G&L (S500) seems fairly heavy to me (but it's alder). Not extreme. Just tending towards the weighty end of things I guess. I'm OK with that. It's within a range that works with me.
I always thought where ash was grown, how much water etc., determined how "dense" (therefore heavy) it wound up being after processing.
Fashion has run the gamut (with me too) from everybody being after sustain in the seventies (remember "brassing out" your guitar?), therefore heavy was in, as it was thought at the time that the less the guitar's structure absorbed in frequencies - the more sustain there would be: to a few years ago light bodies were all the rage because people thought there was more chime and upper harmonics available.
I think you can steer a guitar's sound to tend in a certain direction, but nothing's guaranteed obviously.
Nowadays I'm OK with about anything except extremes (in body weight: either way). I've realized that a versatile, good-sounding guitar (in the middle-of-the-road, weight-wise) gives me the most lattitude for varying strings, amps, technique, etc., to cover the various sounds and styles I want to explore.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:13 pm
- Location: Tasmania, Australia
Re: Ash weight?
G&L Legacy's and the George Fullerton Signature models have identical pickups. Slightly different circuit, that's all. (Fullerton has the vintage strat circuit.) It's still a relevant bodywood tone comparison.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:39 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Ash weight?
I agree with this.standards guy wrote:I've had real heavy ash guitars, and a real light "swamp ash" guitar (not G&L's).
I always thought where ash was grown, how much water etc., determined how "dense" (therefore heavy) it wound up being after processing.
Fashion has run the gamut (with me too) from everybody being after sustain in the seventies (remember "brassing out" your guitar?), therefore heavy was in, as it was thought at the time that the less the guitar's structure absorbed in frequencies - the more sustain there would be: to a few years ago light bodies were all the rage because people thought there was more chime and upper harmonics available.
I think you can steer a guitar's sound to tend in a certain direction, but nothing's guaranteed obviously.
Wood varies, and there are great examples of light, medium, and heavy-weight guitars.
It seems to me that you bond with some more than others. Weight certainly plays a factor, though, especially at the end of the 3rd set!
IMO YMMV
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:58 pm
- Location: California Coast
Re: Ash weight?
ant_riv wrote:...you bond with some more than others. Weight certainly plays a factor, though, especially at the end of the 3rd set!...
Exactly!
Nowadays I sit on gigs. But I once had a Les Paul Recording model that was ungiggable from a weight standpoint! Sheesh!
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:49 pm
- Location: Johnson City, TN
Re: Ash weight?
Mine is les paul heavy but I can't help but love it..like its got substance, or for lack of a better term 'balls.' It's never become a bother as in my back hurting or anything like that and it sits real well on the strap. ASAT btw not a Legacy
Mike
Mike
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:35 am
Re: Ash weight?
My left shoulder has been bugging me lately so I was hoping for something lighter than my current Strat. I had heard that sometimes G&L's came with lightweight ash. I guess I'm rolling the dice on this one.
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:25 am
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
Re: Ash weight?
scolfax wrote:The guy at the shop I'm ordering from says they won't do that. I specifically asked for "lightweight ash" and he said G&L doesn't/won't do that for me.GDub wrote:I asked for a "lightweight" ash body when I custom ordered my butterscotch blond S-500, and got just that. It's VERY resonant, but a lot lighter than my alder ASAT Special and alder Legacy. Ask and you might receive.
Give Buffalo Bros. a call. I ordered my S-500 through them and got what I wanted.
--GDub
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:35 am
Re: Ash weight?
I mentioned this post to my shop and they revised the order. Thanks guys!
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:08 am
Re: Ash weight?
You inspired me to e-mail my dealer last night to see if I could make a similar specification on mine. It's been over 2 weeks since I place my order, but I thought I'd check anyway. He e-mailed back that he would contact his G&L rep and see.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:35 am
Re: Ash weight?
Cool! But I'm so impatient I'd almost rather have the wrong color than have to wait another two weeks!Muleya wrote:You inspired me to e-mail my dealer last night to see if I could make a similar specification on mine. It's been over 2 weeks since I place my order, but I thought I'd check anyway. He e-mailed back that he would contact his G&L rep and see.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:12 pm
Re: Ash weight?
I've read that for Ash to be good, it needs to be lighter than Alder, which is hard to come by.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:12 pm
Re: Ash weight?
True, and I say pay the price or forget it.Tim Buffalo Bros wrote:Howdy:
There are a few small luthiers who hand pick their
wood, however that usually raises the price considerably .
Regards,
Tim
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11349
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:52 am
- Location: Either Coto De Caza, CA or Paso Robles, CA
Re: Ash weight?
Where did you read that? I have not heard anyone complain about or describe G&L's Swamp Ash bodies as being no good.Skwisgaar wrote:I've read that for Ash to be good, it needs to be lighter than Alder, which is hard to come by.
Only occasionally do you hear someone say they have one which is on the heavy side.
--Craig [co-webmaster of guitarsbyleo.com, since Oct. 16, 2000]
Welcome! Read This First
Got a G&L question? Check out the: G&L Knowledgebase
Current G&L Specifications and Options
Welcome! Read This First
Got a G&L question? Check out the: G&L Knowledgebase
Current G&L Specifications and Options
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:12 pm
Re: Ash weight?
Don't remember the place. The story was that Fender switched to alder as their first choice of timber because good ash became hard to come by decades ago. Part of what makes those 50's stratocasters so valuable.Craig wrote:Where did you read that? I have not heard anyone complain about or describe G&L's Swamp Ash bodies as being no good.Skwisgaar wrote:I've read that for Ash to be good, it needs to be lighter than Alder, which is hard to come by.
Only occasionally do you hear someone say they have one which is on the heavy side.
-
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Ontario,Canada
Re: Ash weight?
Probably a local/era issue if anything real. People find a million reason to make those old guitars that were far from optimal into holy grails.
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:53 pm
- Location: Minneapolis & Captiva
Re: Ash weight?
What does that mean? You "...read it somewhere" and that's sufficient to stomp on G&L's reputation. Are you an arborist? I think disclosure of your full bibliography is required. Otherwise, have a wonderful day!Skwisgaar wrote:True, and I say pay the price or forget it.
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:08 am
Re: Ash weight?
Here's the reply I got from my dealer...seems I made my request just in time! And the answer sounds reasonable to me...the weight isn't a "make or break" deal AFAIC. It was also kind of cool to find out they are just ready to start working on it!
Just spoke with my rep after he had talked to the G&L guys. He said they were just getting ready to start on the guitar so it wasn't too late to make the request.
The answer he got from G&L is that they don't make a black & white distinction between light weight versus regular weight in the ash bodies. However, if requested they will make the effort to pick one of the lighter weight bodies of the ones they have available. There's no extra charge but no guarantee of getting a specific weight. We've made the request so hopefully it will come in at least a bit lighter than it would have if we had not made the request.
-
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Ontario,Canada
Re: Ash weight?
Neat, Mine weighs in at 7 lbs I think, imo a light guitar. My hog and maple super strat with a floyd weighs between 8.5 and 9 lbs. I like that one a lot. Not too heavy for a bassist, that is certain.Muleya wrote:Here's the reply I got from my dealer...seems I made my request just in time! And the answer sounds reasonable to me...the weight isn't a "make or break" deal AFAIC. It was also kind of cool to find out they are just ready to start working on it!
Just spoke with my rep after he had talked to the G&L guys. He said they were just getting ready to start on the guitar so it wasn't too late to make the request.
The answer he got from G&L is that they don't make a black & white distinction between light weight versus regular weight in the ash bodies. However, if requested they will make the effort to pick one of the lighter weight bodies of the ones they have available. There's no extra charge but no guarantee of getting a specific weight. We've made the request so hopefully it will come in at least a bit lighter than it would have if we had not made the request.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 8:56 am
- Location: NE Minnesota
Re: Ash weight?
For the record.......My '96 S-500 has a swamp ash body and weighs 9.0 lbs. and the sustain and tone are superb. And my '08 JB2 bass has an alder body with a flame maple cap and it weighs 8.4 lbs and also has superb sustain and tone. Considering the extensive routing on the S-500 for the pickups, control cavity, and the vibrato system, and the massive bridge (and the heavy bass strings) on the JB2, I was a little shocked to find the guitar actually weighs more than the bass by over half a pound.
Being a former G&L dealer, I had always noticed the weight had less to do with a great sounding and sustaining guitar than the quality of the build, the hardware and the electronics did.
Stephen.....Up in the frozen Tundra of Minnesota
Being a former G&L dealer, I had always noticed the weight had less to do with a great sounding and sustaining guitar than the quality of the build, the hardware and the electronics did.
Stephen.....Up in the frozen Tundra of Minnesota
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:08 am
Re: Ash weight?
Thanks for that insight into the factory, Tim...good info!
And the perspective is good to have, as well.
And from a guy who's never picked up a banjo, I have to say I'm floored to hear they weigh 14 lbs!!! I would have guessed they'd be along the lines of an acoustic guitar! What makes them so heavy?
And the perspective is good to have, as well.
And from a guy who's never picked up a banjo, I have to say I'm floored to hear they weigh 14 lbs!!! I would have guessed they'd be along the lines of an acoustic guitar! What makes them so heavy?
-
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:30 pm
- Location: Ontario,Canada
Re: Ash weight?
The black wooden bit is pretty thick and dense, not to mention the metal on the drum part. I was shocked the first time I picked one up too.Muleya wrote:Thanks for that insight into the factory, Tim...good info!
And the perspective is good to have, as well.
And from a guy who's never picked up a banjo, I have to say I'm floored to hear they weigh 14 lbs!!! I would have guessed they'd be along the lines of an acoustic guitar! What makes them so heavy?