Fender - why?

The place for non-G&L and general music discussions.
User avatar
sam
Posts: 1971
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:38 am

Fender - why?

Post by sam »

Here's Fenders latest lipstick on a pig, money grab, they have just announced this offering

Image

22 narrow-tall frets, a Modern C”-shaped maple Tele neck, a 9.5”-radius fingerboard and Fender Custom Shop ‘51 Nocaster single-coil bridge and neck pickups, all for $1999.00.

https://www.guitarplayer.com/gear/fende ... uard-strat

My impression is :thumbdown:

Whatchathink?
Cya,
Sam
User avatar
Danley
Posts: 711
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:23 pm
Location: Orange County, California Republic

Re: Fender - why?

Post by Danley »

I'm sure it plays fine but not a looker in any aspect. Some of the Fender 'alternate universe' models are cool, others gratuitous. This one looks weird to guitarists and vanilla to a casual audience so I don't see the point. G&L still had a much better value model.
User avatar
DanDoulogos
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:08 am
Location: Canada

Re: Fender - why?

Post by DanDoulogos »

I see an overpriced partscaster.
G & L: '08 Comanche (Tribute) | '14 ASAT Classic | '00 ASAT Spec | '21 JB2 (Tribute)
Other: '87 Strat | '05 Heritage CH-157 | '12 Tele Select Koa | '19 MJT Esquire | '18 Taylor | 2015 Chrome Epi Dobro |
User avatar
WitSok
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: Fender - why?

Post by WitSok »

This is the least parallel universe of the collection. Okay, you put a tele on a strat body. So what, it is an ugly partcaster. You would have thought at the very least they would have gave it a trem and laid out the controls more like a strat (could of had a tone pot for each pickup).
Danley wrote:Some of the Fender 'alternate universe' models are cool, others gratuitous. This one looks weird to guitarists and vanilla to a casual audience so I don't see the point. G&L still had a much better value model.
I agree!
User avatar
willross
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:55 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Fender - why?

Post by willross »

Ok, it's like opposite of a Nashville Tele.... with a s-type bridge. ;)

Hey, when I saw Parker do it(P36, etc.) - I'm no longer surprised.
User avatar
guitar_ed
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:30 am
Location: Baja, Oregon

Re: Fender - why?

Post by guitar_ed »

I see the comfort & ergonomics of a Strat, with the tones of Tele. What's the problem?

edg
Piss off a politician, register to vote.
User avatar
john o
Posts: 981
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:52 am
Location: Delaware

Re: Fender - why?

Post by john o »

telestrater
john o
User avatar
sam
Posts: 1971
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Fender - why?

Post by sam »

Interesting comments, all appreciated. Reason for my comment was, as a few have said, this is just an overpriced partcaster IMHO.

As much as I do like mods on an ASAT or tele, it just does not look right with the tele control plate. Like WitSok said, at least put a trem bar on it to have some strat hardware. I know some like chocolate and some like vanilla, but 2k for some of their "parallel universe" guitars does not look like a good use of either money or guitar parts. ;)
Cya,
Sam
User avatar
Danley
Posts: 711
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:23 pm
Location: Orange County, California Republic

Re: Fender - why?

Post by Danley »

Somehow the ergonomics of the Telecaster were always in more agreement with my body than those of the Strat; the bridge is a small fraction closer to the strap button on a Strat than a Tele, which is enough to bother me (by making me 'chicken-wing' my elbow to an uncomfortable degree.)

I also dislike tummy-cuts, believe it or not; if I play while sitting, they cause the guitar to angle its face slightly up rather than staying parallel on my knee, which is annoying. That said my least favorite Strat quirk is the strings being too close to the body (causing too much 'dig in') due to the low-profile of the bridge & saddles; and that is averted by this guitar's use of the Telecaster bridge... As is the clusterf*** of the volume knob being too close to the strings, or the trem arm for that matter- For me the area of a Strat where the volume knob, high E string and trem bar exit come together within a couple inches of each other, is the Bermuda Triangle for my knuckles.
User avatar
yowhatsshakin
Posts: 3340
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:00 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Fender - why?

Post by yowhatsshakin »

Is there a guitar psychologist around somewhere? This guitar clearly has an identity crises, if not suffers from bipolar personality disorder ... ;-)

- Jos
User avatar
mutts
Posts: 234
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2017 6:02 pm
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: Fender - why?

Post by mutts »

I kinda like it but won’t run out and buy one. I was pretty intrigued by the Jazztele they introduced this summer. It sounded like a nicely appointed guitar and sounded good in clips. I didn’t love the color options though.
Overall I think it’s cool that Fender did these mash-ups.
User avatar
Danley
Posts: 711
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:23 pm
Location: Orange County, California Republic

Re: Fender - why?

Post by Danley »

Worst thing about the JazzTele is, it ripped me off from 2008 :D

(I chose different aesthetic spacing to the tailpiece, among other details...)

Image
Image
User avatar
sam
Posts: 1971
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Fender - why?

Post by sam »

Man, they STOLE that! :x All of those those missing royalties!

I choose yours :thumbup:
Cya,
Sam
User avatar
Danley
Posts: 711
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:23 pm
Location: Orange County, California Republic

Re: Fender - why?

Post by Danley »

Thanks :D Still have the guitar- and the tuners are sorted now ;)

Perhaps worth bearing in mind - I did not intend it to be an oddball: I wanted a real Jazzmaster project, and traded some items to a 'friend' for in exchange for a Seafoam body. I'd dealt with him before so felt trusting to not pick up the body immediately- But he sold it in the meantime. Serious alcoholic/idiot, I didn't get reimbursed.

Not able to budget a replacement, I picked up a cheap/shot Telecaster body and did that :) Still have another revamp in mind: possible refinish (as the original now looks 'relic'd' and checked- not my style) and some new pickups.
User avatar
Lacking Talent
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:29 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Fender - why?

Post by Lacking Talent »

Agree on the too-high pricing, though I do like that layout, reminds me of the Chandler Metro I used to have...

Image
John C
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:56 am

Re: Fender - why?

Post by John C »

Some of these Fender "Parallel Universe" models are just popular home-builds/partscasters. If you don't like it, don't worry about it as they are only going to make say 500 of them anyway.

Please note that these have a nitro finish - and $1,999 is pretty much the going rate for a nitro finished Fender (the normal "American Original" models range from $1,750 to $1,999). But who buys a Fender at MAP? Anyone can walk into a Guitar Center and use one of their 15% off coupons on a Fender product (they ignore that fine print that lists Fender among the excluded brands if you are there in person or if you call in, but the website won't apply it if you're trying to buy it online).

For comparison - what is the going rate for a nitro finished G&L from the Custom Shop - say just an ASAT Classic with the only CS option being nitro?
User avatar
yowhatsshakin
Posts: 3340
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:00 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Fender - why?

Post by yowhatsshakin »

John C wrote:Some of these Fender "Parallel Universe" models are just popular home-builds/partscasters. If you don't like it, don't worry about it as they are only going to make say 500 of them anyway.
Only 500, eh? And then you realize 500 is about 2% of all guitars G&L built when Leo was still alive ... Hmmm ...

- Jos
User avatar
Danley
Posts: 711
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:23 pm
Location: Orange County, California Republic

Re: Fender - why?

Post by Danley »

yowhatsshakin wrote:
John C wrote:Some of these Fender "Parallel Universe" models are just popular home-builds/partscasters. If you don't like it, don't worry about it as they are only going to make say 500 of them anyway.
Only 500, eh? And then you realize 500 is about 2% of all guitars G&L built when Leo was still alive ... Hmmm ...

- Jos
...Hah. Funny to put it that way. I think there's a lot of overlap in the fandom (I own minimum one each of all the major Fender models - Mustang, Jaguar, Jazzmaster, Strat, Telecaster) but when you put it that way as far as numbers, then factor in quality it makes the Leo-era G&Ls seem like such a better bargain (vs. any era Fender.)

Again- I don't hate Fender and I'm glad for some freaking reason there is still a large enough market for guitars period that you can consider a 500 run limited. But really interesting perspective.
John C
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:56 am

Re: Fender - why?

Post by John C »

yowhatsshakin wrote:
John C wrote:Some of these Fender "Parallel Universe" models are just popular home-builds/partscasters. If you don't like it, don't worry about it as they are only going to make say 500 of them anyway.
Only 500, eh? And then you realize 500 is about 2% of all guitars G&L built when Leo was still alive ... Hmmm ...

- Jos
It's relative - "only 500" is pretty small considering Fender's current output of around 80,000 units per year. But it's 1/2 the output of say Tom Anderson who does 800-1,000 per year.
User avatar
mutts
Posts: 234
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2017 6:02 pm
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: Fender - why?

Post by mutts »

Danley wrote:Worst thing about the JazzTele is, it ripped me off from 2008 :D

(I chose different aesthetic spacing to the tailpiece, among other details...)

Image
Image
That's very cool. The pickguard shape on your works better to my eyes. Better color choice too.
There has been a Danocaster for sale on the web lately that is pretty interesting; it has a jazz p'up in the neck but a tele at the bridge position. It also retains the steel plate around the bridge pickup but has a Jazz trem.
Weighs 8.6...too much for me!

I see some of the Fender Jazz-Teles are 15% off. It looks like they actually built some nice features into the guitar from what little I saw. Evidently the bridge is a fresh design and the pickups are Custom Shop.
Palmtree
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2018 4:29 pm

Re: Fender - why?

Post by Palmtree »

John C.,

I read at https://www.soundunlimited.co.uk/blogs/ ... r_timeline that in '98 Fender had manufacturing capacity in Ensenada alone at 350 per day!

I'm new around here. Does anyone have an idea how many G&L turns out in a year? I'm sure someone here has the real number but just for fun I did some quick arithmetic based on them having ~30 employees. Assuming that 5 are administrative, that leaves 25 in production. Not sure if it's probable that they could make 2 guitars per production employee per day, but if so that would come to 2,600 a year.

What's the real number? :searching:

The Palm
User avatar
GentlemanJim
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:10 pm
Location: Evergreen, Al

Re: Fender - why?

Post by GentlemanJim »

guitar_ed wrote:I see the comfort & ergonomics of a Strat, with the tones of Tele. What's the problem?

edg

I kind of like it myself, don't think I'd buy one, maybe a different color would look more inviting. Anyone know the model number.. Just curious

Jimbo
User avatar
LAPlayer
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 12, 2020 9:55 pm
Location: Denver/LA

Re: Fender - why?

Post by LAPlayer »

guitar_ed wrote:I see the comfort & ergonomics of a Strat, with the tones of Tele. What's the problem?
edg
My feelings exactly. Great looking Strat with Tele soul. It's probably a killer guitar. I play Fenders when I'm not behind a G&L so I have zero hatred for them.