Tebow Time

Off Topic discussions, non-music related.
User avatar
StratsRock
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:19 pm

Tebow Time

Post by StratsRock »

WOW! What a game!
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by louis cyfer »

tebow annoys me to no end. if someone doesn't knock him out soon, he's gonna run football.
User avatar
StratsRock
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:19 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by StratsRock »

louis cyfer wrote:tebow annoys me to no end. if someone doesn't knock him out soon, he's gonna run football.
Must be a Steelers fan. LOL
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by louis cyfer »

StratsRock wrote:
louis cyfer wrote:tebow annoys me to no end. if someone doesn't knock him out soon, he's gonna run football.
Must be a Steelers fan. LOL
no. not even. not a raiderrs fan either, but it broke my heart that they lost to the chargers. i used to like denver before tebow.
User avatar
KenC
Posts: 2344
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:18 pm
Location: None of the above

Re: Tebow Time

Post by KenC »

I'm right there with you, Louis. I've had it with all of the media hype about him, but as long as his fans eat it up the press will dish it out.
Michael-GnL-Michael
Posts: 744
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 8:24 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by Michael-GnL-Michael »

KenC wrote:I'm right there with you, Louis. I've had it with all of the media hype about him, but as long as his fans eat it up the press will dish it out.
There should be a different name used to refer to "the press" in its current form. These days its function is more of a stirring up of sh!t than reporter of news.
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by louis cyfer »

Michael-GnL-Michael wrote:
KenC wrote:I'm right there with you, Louis. I've had it with all of the media hype about him, but as long as his fans eat it up the press will dish it out.
There should be a different name used to refer to "the press" in its current form. These days its function is more of a stirring up of sh!t than reporter of news.
indeed. they are no longer the fourth estate. they don't report, they try to make news, and give opinions. not exactly what journalism is supposed to be about.
User avatar
StratsRock
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:19 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by StratsRock »

Geez.... Sorry I brought it up! I just said it was a good game!
repoman
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:14 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by repoman »

I'm a little late to the party but hells yeah that was a good game!
The thing I like about Tebow is that he is exciting to watch. He'll have a couple of bonehead plays followed by some fantastic plays.

I think we can all pretty much agree that the press in general sucks.
User avatar
yowhatsshakin
Posts: 3340
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:00 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Tebow Time

Post by yowhatsshakin »

repoman wrote:I'm a little late to the party but hells yeah that was a good game!
Heck yeah. Much better than that dud of a BCS Championship Game yesterday. What a disappointment! I rather would have like to see 'Bama play the Ducks for that matter. Even the game my Huskies lost against Baylor had a way higher entertainment value than yesterdays abomination.

- Jos
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by louis cyfer »

yowhatsshakin wrote:
repoman wrote:I'm a little late to the party but hells yeah that was a good game!
Heck yeah. Much better than that dud of a BCS Championship Game yesterday. What a disappointment! I rather would have like to see 'Bama play the Ducks for that matter. Even the game my Huskies lost against Baylor had a way higher entertainment value than yesterdays abomination.

- Jos
indeed. but we already knew that after first game what was gonna happen.
Michael-GnL-Michael
Posts: 744
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 8:24 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by Michael-GnL-Michael »

StratsRock wrote:Geez.... Sorry I brought it up! I just said it was a good game!
Okay so now instead of comments on the current state of journalism the topic is going in the direction of games that sucked compared to how Tebow plays.

Are you happier with that?

I guess in future threads you could try including rules that apply to your threads or you could just accept that you have no control over a thread simply because you start one.

;)
User avatar
StratsRock
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:19 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by StratsRock »

Michael-GnL-Michael wrote:
StratsRock wrote:Geez.... Sorry I brought it up! I just said it was a good game!
Okay so now instead of comments on the current state of journalism the topic is going in the direction of games that sucked compared to how Tebow plays.

Are you happier with that?

I guess in future threads you could try including rules that apply to your threads or you could just accept that you have no control over a thread simply because you start one.

;)

WOW... friendly forum member.
Michael-GnL-Michael
Posts: 744
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 8:24 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by Michael-GnL-Michael »

StratsRock wrote:
Michael-GnL-Michael wrote:
StratsRock wrote:Geez.... Sorry I brought it up! I just said it was a good game!
Okay so now instead of comments on the current state of journalism the topic is going in the direction of games that sucked compared to how Tebow plays.

Are you happier with that?

I guess in future threads you could try including rules that apply to your threads or you could just accept that you have no control over a thread simply because you start one.

;)

WOW... friendly forum member.
Really? "Wow" Are you some 10 year old kid or something, using the enlarged text? Lighten up!
User avatar
Ahryn
Posts: 369
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 2:05 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C, Canada.

Re: Tebow Time

Post by Ahryn »

Wow this took a dark twisty turn.

Does football really matter this much on a guitar forum?
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by louis cyfer »

guys, chill. obviously it is a misunderstanding. remember we have absolutely no reason to hurt eachother's feelings, so if something comes off as snide, or unfriendly, give the benefit of doubt, it is a misunderstanding. don't take it wrong, even if it may be construed that way, it was probably not meant that way.
Michael-GnL-Michael
Posts: 744
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 8:24 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by Michael-GnL-Michael »

StratsRock,

I accept your apology.

Michael :happy0007:


...it was just a fun poke at the situation... :)
Cannon01
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 9:05 am

Re: Tebow Time

Post by Cannon01 »

As we like to say in my neck of the woods --- GO PATS!!!
louis cyfer
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Re: Tebow Time

Post by louis cyfer »

tebow time has met its inevitable conclusion. the lowest completion percentage in 30 years.
User avatar
KenC
Posts: 2344
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:18 pm
Location: None of the above

Re: Tebow Time

Post by KenC »

But he may have set a record for sacks-to-completions ratio, if anybody keeps track of that. I think it was around halftime before he finally had as many completions as sacks.
User avatar
JagInTheBag
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:46 pm
Location: Grayslake, IL

Re: Tebow Time

Post by JagInTheBag »

Michael-GnL-Michael wrote: There should be a different name used to refer to "the press" in its current form. These days its function is more of a stirring up of sh!t than reporter of news.


Agreed, much more interested in pushing people's buttons that straight reporting. The volume of reporting on "the Tebow" was ridiculous and the quality of dialogue was abysmal. Hollywood has taken over journalism. :sick: