Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:50 pm
Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:13 pm
Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:55 pm
Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:48 pm
RampageFan wrote:Do you guys have similar experiences with the same model? Or is it just in my head? Do the newer, CNC guitars have any differences or are they more consistent in feel and tone?
RampageFan wrote:For the collectors out there, do you play them all? Or do they sit in the case and are kinda forgotten about?
Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:25 pm
RampageFan wrote:Do you guys have similar experiences with the same model? Or is it just in my head? Do the newer, CNC guitars have any differences or are they more consistent in feel and tone?
Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:34 pm
yowhatsshakin wrote:Hey Dave,
Which brings me to your Non-G&L question:
What I try to collect is the complete story of the ASAT, whatever that may mean. And yes, you cannot play them all all of the time, but with my Guitar Of The Week regimen, each gets some major playing time. Don't feel too bad about that. Frequently, no matter what GOTW is on the work bench, I might still grab some other guitar because I just feel like playing that one. Over the weekend I played my nylon string Ovation Classic 1863-4, Collings OOO, hog Bluesboy (and still find that a weird model), SC-2, Legacy Special, and PRS 245 Sunburst for good form. Not bad I would say. Main thing is, you should enjoy whatever you're doing and I certainly do.
- Jos
Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:44 pm
Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:57 pm
willross wrote:Good luck on your diet journey. A multivitamin helps too. As for the "same" guitar sounding different: G&L's have changed drastically since the beginning. With the exception of the new one's coming out of the gate, my favorites are from the 90's. That's just me... It seems like guitar companies have run the gauntlet of quality vs. profit margin. Trying cheaper materials & methods, etc. and finding that balance. However during that period, many small luthiers got into the game: some focused on the cheap / others on quality. Now there's more than ever! Well some of those cheap makers shouldn't be labelled luthiers; more like factories...
I can't collect too many guitars. If they don't fit me, they're history. My largest collection is percussion (clay & wood). These new G&L's are amazing and I may change my tune...
Cheers,
Will
KenC wrote:
I find a tremendous difference within the same model. My '81 L2KE and '00 L2K fretless are worlds apart in feel and tone, aside from the obvious difference of fretted vs. fretless. The '81 L2KE and '80 L1K have the same 'hog/maple combination and similar strings; they are more alike than different on the neck pup, but there is still a difference in tone. The L1K has a little bit more fundamental, and the L2KE makes up for it in overtones.
On the guitar front, the '82 SC-1 runs rings around the '82 SC-2 in tone and versatility (maybe the one-pup G&Ls are just magical). One of the maple-bodied '86 ASATs has a lot more clarity from the pups, and I can distinctly hear both of them in the middle switch position. The pups on the other blend together. Ironically, the better tone is from the one with a Kahler.
Ken
blargfromouterspace wrote:There are differences in each of my CNC made ASATs. String tension and the roundness of the fingerboard edges are most noticeable. Really is surprising.
Jos - I'm really keen to hear about the pine body on P&C, if its lightweight and resonant. I hope she's still in one piece . I'll keep my fingers crossed!
Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:00 pm
RampageFan wrote:I have read a lot about Kahler being tone killers. Maybe they go well with maple bodied guitars. I've had no problem with Kahler's.
Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:22 pm
louis cyfer wrote:rampage, you lost 38 lbs, but do you know how much your body composition changed?
Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:33 pm
blargfromouterspace wrote:Jos - I'm really keen to hear about the pine body on P&C, if its lightweight and resonant. I hope she's still in one piece . I'll keep my fingers crossed!
RampageFan wrote:I can't wait to hear your report on the incoming prototype. I have enjoyed looking at the prototypes G&L have made available. Yours looks very, very cool!
Thanks,
Dave
Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:15 pm
zapcosongs wrote:louis cyfer wrote:rampage, you lost 38 lbs, but do you know how much your body composition changed?
I dunno, but I'm guessing his nuts to butts ratio has increased substantially, and I'm proud of him! - ed
Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:36 pm
RampageFan wrote:zapcosongs wrote:louis cyfer wrote:rampage, you lost 38 lbs, but do you know how much your body composition changed?
I dunno, but I'm guessing his nuts to butts ratio has increased substantially, and I'm proud of him! - ed
I just about spit out my water when I read that! I didn't see that one coming! Thanks Ed!
Louis, I don't know the technicalities of weight loss, just know I look and feel better
Dave
Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:09 am
Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:44 am