Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:01 pm
Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:36 pm
zapcosongs wrote:I thought the earliest (80/81) L1K bass guitars had slot-pole pickups. I suspect the answer is more complicated.... - ed
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120592313650&fromMakeTrack=true&ssPageName=VIP:watchlink:top:en
Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:51 pm
Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:06 pm
zapcosongs wrote:That's extremely interesting, Craig. Thanks!
It does make me wonder what was behind the change from the large allen head pole pieces to the slot head pole pieces then finally to the smaller allen head pole pieces within the course of those first two or three years. From a purely economic (or even electormagnetic) perspective, it doesn't seem to make obvious sense. Do you have any info or maybe a theory here? - ed
Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:30 am
Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:44 am
zapcosongs wrote:And then there's the issue of why go from large to small allen head screws ultimately. I'm guessing that the large would actually be a bit easier to adjust...... Interesting indeed!
Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:17 am
Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:35 am
yowhatsshakin wrote:As a physicist I would say it is how the shape of the pole piece affects the magnetic field. It is easy to see that a slotted head has only a 2-fold symmetry: it looks the same only in its current position and when you rotate it 180˚. A allen screw has a six-fold symmetry and hence has more positions where it looks the same. The ideal would be a circle where it would look the same no matter how much of a twist you give it. But you would be able to device a tool that would be useful. I guess the transition to small allen screws has to do with trying to minimize the amount of material that is absent to make the magnetic field as uniform as possible. Bt one would have to do finite element analysis to really support all of these statements.
Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:00 am
replyman wrote:Don't forget your oscilloscope; I'll bring my old green one...